mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoIP: A United Framework to Integrate Physics into Gaussian Processes

arXiv 2202.12316 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2022cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physical modeling is critical for many modern science and engineering applications. From a data science or machine learning perspective, where more domain-agnostic, data-driven models are pervasive, physical knowledge -- often expressed as differential equations -- is valuable in that it is complementary to data, and it can potentially help overcome issues such as data sparsity, noise, and inaccuracy. In this work, we propose a simple, yet powerful and general framework -- AutoIP, for Automatically Incorporating Physics -- that can integrate all kinds of differential equations into Gaussian Processes (GPs) to enhance prediction accuracy and uncertainty quantification. These equations can be linear or nonlinear, spatial, temporal, or spatio-temporal, complete or incomplete with unknown source terms, and so on. Based on kernel differentiation, we construct a GP prior to sample the values of the target function, equation-related derivatives, and latent source functions, which are all jointly from a multivariate Gaussian distribution. The sampled values are fed to two likelihoods: one to fit the observations, and the other to conform to the equation. We use the whitening method to evade the strong dependency between the sampled function values and kernel parameters, and we develop a stochastic variational learning algorithm. AutoIP shows improvement upon vanilla GPs in both simulation and several real-world applications, even using rough, incomplete equations.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2022.

Builds on

22 of 46 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  5. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
  6. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  7. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  8. 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 377
  9. 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 188
  10. 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 144
  11. 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 139
  12. 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 128
10 more
  1. 2019Learning in Modal Space: Solving Time-Dependent Stochastic PDEs Using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 63
  2. 2018Learning unknown ODE models with Gaussian processescited by 54
  3. 2019Physics-Informed Probabilistic Learning of Linear Embeddings of Non-linear Dynamics With Guaranteed Stabilitycited by 53
  4. 2020Determinantal Point Processes in Randomized Numerical Linear Algebracited by 41
  5. 2021Multifidelity Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)cited by 25
  6. 2018Fast Gaussian Process Based Gradient Matching for Parameter Identification in Systems of Nonlinear ODEscited by 17
  7. 2019ODIN: ODE-Informed Regression for Parameter and State Inference in Time-Continuous Dynamical Systemscited by 17
  8. 2020Physics Informed Deep Kernel Learningcited by 12
  9. 2019Black-Box Inference for Non-Linear Latent Force Modelscited by 9
  10. 2018Constraining the Dynamics of Deep Probabilistic Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Error Analysis of Kernel/GP Methods for Nonlinear and Parametric PDEscited by 21
  2. 2023Solving High Frequency and Multi-Scale PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 14
  3. 2023A spectrum of physics-informed Gaussian processes for regression in engineeringcited by 13
  4. 2023Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrologycited by 11
  5. 2023Random Grid Neural Processes for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 8
  6. 2024Physics-Informed Variational State-Space Gaussian Processescited by 7
  7. 2024Toward Efficient Kernel-Based Solvers for Nonlinear PDEscited by 7
  8. 2023Equation Discovery with Bayesian Spike-and-Slab Priors and Efficient Kernelscited by 5
  9. 2024Gaussian Measures Conditioned on Nonlinear Observations: Consistency, MAP Estimators, and Simulationcited by 4
  10. 2025Position: Biology is the Challenge Physics-Informed ML Needs to Evolvecited by 4
  11. 2026Conditioning Gaussian Processes on Almost Anythingcited by 3
  12. 2024Iterated INLA for State and Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 1
8 more
  1. 2025Understanding Generalization in Physics Informed Models through Affine Variety Dimensionscited by 1
  2. 2025LVM-GP: Uncertainty-Aware PDE Solver via coupling latent variable model and Gaussian processcited by 1
  3. 2025Tensor Gaussian Processes: Efficient Solvers for Nonlinear PDEscited by 1
  4. 2023Domain Invariant Learning for Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Explorationcited by 0
  5. 2025Deep Gaussian Processes for Functional Mapscited by 0
  6. 2026Machine learning assisted state prediction of misspecified linear dynamical system via modal reductioncited by 0
  7. 2026Bayesian Nonparametric Mixed-Effect ODEs with Gaussian Processescited by 0
  8. 2026Real-Time State-of-Health Estimation and Online Degradation Prognosis from Partial Battery Discharge Using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0