LAUKIN: A Multi-jurisdictional Common Law Contract Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multinational companies increasingly require cross-jurisdictional contract review, yet existing legal NLP datasets are largely restricted to a single jurisdiction. We introduce LAUKIN (Legal equivalence dataset of Australia, UK, and INdia), a dataset of clause pairs (AU-UK, UK-IN, IN-AU) labelled for boolean legal equivalence. We develop a novel multi-stage retrieval and reranking pipeline to construct the initial clause pair mapping, with a subset of clause pairs subsequently annotated by legal experts as Equivalent or Not Equivalent. The dataset comprises 14,727 clause pairs from 204 contracts across 8 agreement types, of which 3,000 are manually labelled: 900 train, 600 dev, and 1,500 test. We evaluate 12 models across 4 techniques, achieving a best macro-F1 of 65.11%, establishing LAUKIN as a challenging benchmark. Results reveal that, despite shared legal heritage, drafting conventions diverge significantly across jurisdictions, making cross-jurisdictional equivalence classification non-trivial. LAUKIN also includes 11,727 unlabelled training pairs to support future semi-supervised learning research in legal NLP.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
6 of 19 references.
References · 6
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challengescited by 42
- 2025A Survey of Classification Tasks and Approaches for Legal Contractscited by 6
- 2025Evaluating Customized vs. Generalist Transformer-based Models for Legal Contract Classificationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.