mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bias Analysis for Synthetic Face Detection: A Case Study of the Impact of Facial Attributes

arXiv 2507.19705 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bias analysis for synthetic face detection is bound to become a critical topic in the coming years. Although many detection models have been developed and several datasets have been released to reliably identify synthetic content, one crucial aspect has been largely overlooked: these models and training datasets can be biased, leading to failures in detection for certain demographic groups and raising significant social, legal, and ethical issues. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework to contribute to the analysis of bias of synthetic face detectors with respect to several facial attributes. This framework exploits synthetic data generation, with evenly distributed attribute labels, for mitigating any skew in the data that could otherwise influence the outcomes of bias analysis. We build on the proposed framework to provide an extensive case study of the bias level of five state-of-the-art detectors in synthetic datasets with 25 controlled facial attributes. While the results confirm that, in general, synthetic face detectors are biased towards the presence/absence of specific facial attributes, our study also sheds light on the origins of the observed bias through the analysis of the correlations with the balancing of facial attributes in the training sets of the detectors, and the analysis of detectors activation maps in image pairs with controlled attribute modifications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 33 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  2. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  3. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  5. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,184
  6. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  7. 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
  8. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
  9. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  10. 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 321
  11. 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Datasetcited by 80
  12. 2022CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 74
9 more
  1. 2022UIA-ViT: Unsupervised Inconsistency-Aware Method based on Vision Transformer for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 69
  2. 2019Use of a Capsule Network to Detect Fake Images and Videoscited by 63
  3. 2023Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detectioncited by 40
  4. 2021An Examination of Fairness of AI Models for Deepfake Detectioncited by 35
  5. 2022GBDF: Gender Balanced DeepFake Dataset Towards Fair DeepFake Detectioncited by 32
  6. 2022GAN-generated Faces Detection: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 30
  7. 2020Investigating Bias in Deep Face Analysis: The KANFace Dataset and Empirical Studycited by 18
  8. 2022Analyzing Fairness in Deepfake Detection With Massively Annotated Databasescited by 13
  9. 2024SDFD: Building a Versatile Synthetic Face Image Dataset with Diverse Attributescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.