mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Negation-Aware Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2507.19064 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study a practical but less-touched problem in Vision-Language Models (VLMs), ie, negation understanding. Specifically, many real-world applications require models to explicitly identify what is false or non-existent, eg, radiologists may search for images that exclude specific conditions. Despite the impressive transferability of VLMs through large-scale training, they suffer from a critical limitation that fails to handle negation. To address this challenge, existing methods attribute its root cause to the scarcity of negation training data and propose to fine-tune VLMs on massive data containing explicit negation. Undoubtedly, such data-centric solutions demand substantial data and computational resources, limiting their sustainable widespread adoption. To tackle negation in a low-carbon manner, we empirically observe that the key obstacle lies in the dual-concept shifts between the affirmation and negation distributions. Therefore, we propose a Negation-Aware Test-Time Adaptation (NEAT) method to efficiently adjust distribution-related parameters during inference. In brief, NEAT can reduce distribution shift in consistent semantics while eliminating false distributional consistency in unrelated semantics. Extensive experiments on the various negation understanding tasks verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Remarkably, with less than 0.01% of trainable parameters, NEAT achieves comparable or superior performance to state-of-the-art post-training approaches. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhc1997/NEAT.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

Builds on

30 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation16 Jan
  2. 2024Dual Prototype Evolving for Test-Time Generalization of Vision-Language Models16 Oct
  3. 2024Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negations29 Mar
  4. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models27 Mar
  5. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion21 Mar
  6. 2023Leveraging Vision-Language Models for Improving Domain Generalization in Image Classification12 Oct
  7. 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning11 Aug
  8. 2023Test-Time Adaptation with CLIP Reward for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models29 May
  9. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?13 Dec
  10. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct
  11. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 19

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  6. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  8. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  9. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  10. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  11. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  12. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
7 more
  1. 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 834
  2. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  3. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  4. 2025Know "No" Better: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhancing Negation Awareness in CLIPcited by 26
  5. 2024Any-Shift Prompting for Generalization over Distributionscited by 24
  6. 2023Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrievalcited by 20
  7. 2024Test-time Adaptation for Cross-modal Retrieval with Query Shiftcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Frustratingly Easy Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation?
  3. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Advancing Reliable Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models under Visual Variations
  5. 2026Bi-MCQ: Reformulating Vision-Language Alignment for Negation Understanding
  6. 2026From Inference to Adaptation: A Unified Optimal Transport View of Vision Language Model
  7. 2025SpaceVLM: Sub-Space Modeling of Negation in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026When Negation Is a Geometry Problem in Vision-Language Models