NAST: Improving Negation Handling in Medical Vision-Language Models through Negation-Aware Selective Training
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Medical vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Negation is a fundamental linguistic operation in clinical reporting, yet vision-language models (VLMs) frequently fail to distinguish affirmative from negated medical statements. To systematically characterize this limitation, we introduce a radiology-specific diagnostic benchmark that evaluates polarity sensitivity under controlled clinical conditions, revealing that common medical VLMs consistently confuse negated and non-negated findings. To enable learning beyond simple condition absence, we further construct a contextual clinical negation dataset that encodes structured claims and supports attribute-level negations involving location and severity. Building on these resources, we propose Negation-Aware Selective Training (NAST), an interpretability-guided adaptation method that uses causal tracing effects (CTEs) to modulate layer-wise gradient updates during fine-tuning. Rather than applying uniform learning rates, NAST scales each layer's update according to its causal contribution to negation processing, transforming mechanistic interpretability signals into a principled optimization rule. Experiments demonstrate improved discrimination of affirmative and negated clinical statements without degrading general vision-language alignment, highlighting the value of causal interpretability for targeted model adaptation in safety-critical medical settings. Code and resources are available at https://github.com/healthylaife/NAST.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025QwenCLIP: Boosting Medical Vision-Language Pretraining via LLM Embeddings and Prompt tuning17 Nov
- 2024UniMed-CLIP: Towards a Unified Image-Text Pretraining Paradigm for Diverse Medical Imaging Modalities13 Dec
Other references · 26
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 636
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2022MedCLIP: Contrastive Learning from Unpaired Medical Images and Textcited by 564
- 2023BiomedCLIP: a multimodal biomedical foundation model pretrained from fifteen million scientific image-text pairscited by 506
- 2023Med-Flamingo: a Multimodal Medical Few-shot Learnercited by 387
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2023PMC-CLIP: Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training using Biomedical Documentscited by 212
14 more
- 2023Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processingcited by 210
- 2021Understanding by Understanding Not: Modeling Negation in Language Modelscited by 73
- 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negationcited by 69
- 2023Towards Vision-Language Mechanistic Interpretability: A Causal Tracing Tool for BLIPcited by 62
- 2025Seeing but Not Believing: Probing the Disconnect Between Visual Attention and Answer Correctness in VLMscited by 48
- 2024Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negationscited by 45
- 2025Know "No" Better: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhancing Negation Awareness in CLIPcited by 26
- 2024How and where does CLIP process negation?cited by 16
- 2025NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation?cited by 12
- 2025Bringing CLIP to the Clinic: Dynamic Soft Labels and Negation-Aware Learning for Medical Analysiscited by 10
- 2025TNG-CLIP:Training-Time Negation Data Generation for Negation Awareness of CLIPcited by 6
- 2025Negation-Aware Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025From No to Know: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Opportunities for Negation Understanding in Multimodal Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2025What "Not" to Detect: Negation-Aware VLMs via Structured Reasoning and Token Mergingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Bi-MCQ: Reformulating Vision-Language Alignment for Negation Understanding
- 2026Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Formal Verification
- 2025A Reality Check of Vision-Language Pre-training in Radiology: Have We Progressed Using Text?
- 2025MedVLM-R1: Incentivizing Medical Reasoning Capability of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025The Effect of Negation on CLIP in Medical Imaging: Limitations of Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining
- 2026Is There Knowledge Left to Extract? Evidence of Fragility in Medically Fine-Tuned Vision-Language Models
- 2025Towards Efficient Medical Reasoning with Minimal Fine-Tuning Data
- 2025Decoupling Clinical and Class-Agnostic Features for Reliable Few-Shot Adaptation under Shift