mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Rate Coding: Surrogate Gradients Enable Spike Timing Learning in Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv 2507.16043 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2025cs.NE cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The surrogate gradient descent algorithm enabled spiking neural networks to be trained to carry out challenging sensory processing tasks, an important step in understanding how spikes contribute to neural computations. However, it is unclear the extent to which these algorithms fully explore the space of possible spiking solutions to problems. We investigated whether spiking networks trained with surrogate gradient descent can learn to make use of information that is only encoded in the timing and not the rate of spikes. We constructed synthetic datasets with a range of types of spike timing information (interspike intervals, spatio-temporal spike patterns or polychrony, and coincidence codes). We find that surrogate gradient descent training can extract all of these types of information. In more realistic speech-based datasets, both timing and rate information is present. We therefore constructed variants of these datasets in which all rate information is removed, and find that surrogate gradient descent can still perform well. We tested all networks both with and without trainable axonal delays. We find that delays can give a significant increase in performance, particularly for more challenging tasks. To determine what types of spike timing information are being used by the networks trained on the speech-based tasks, we test these networks on time-reversed spikes which perturb spatio-temporal spike patterns but leave interspike intervals and coincidence information unchanged. We find that when axonal delays are not used, networks perform well under time reversal, whereas networks trained with delays perform poorly. This suggests that spiking neural networks with delays are better able to exploit temporal structure. To facilitate further studies of temporal coding, we have released our modified speech-based datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.

Builds on

14 of 42 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 626
  2. 2020Incorporating Learnable Membrane Time Constant to Enhance Learning of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 345
  3. 2018SLAYER: Spike Layer Error Reassignment in Timecited by 266
  4. 2017SuperSpike: Supervised learning in multi-layer spiking neural networkscited by 182
  5. 2019The Heidelberg spiking datasets for the systematic evaluation of spiking neural networkscited by 137
  6. 2021Efficient Neuromorphic Signal Processing with Loihi 2cited by 96
  7. 2023Learning Delays in Spiking Neural Networks using Dilated Convolutions with Learnable Spacingscited by 50
  8. 2021Sparse Spiking Gradient Descentcited by 41
  9. 2023DenRAM: Neuromorphic Dendritic Architecture with RRAM for Efficient Temporal Processing with Delayscited by 17
  10. 2022Axonal Delay As a Short-Term Memory for Feed Forward Deep Spiking Neural Networkscited by 11
  11. 2023Adaptive Axonal Delays in feedforward spiking neural networks for accurate spoken word recognitioncited by 11
  12. 2023Delayed Memory Unit: Modelling Temporal Dependency Through Delay Gatecited by 5
2 more
  1. 2024Adapting to time: Why nature may have evolved a diverse set of neuronscited by 5
  2. 2022Spikemax: Spike-based Loss Methods for Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.