Stereo-based 3D Anomaly Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A New Dataset and Baseline
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
3D detection technology is widely used in the field of autonomous driving, with its application scenarios gradually expanding from enclosed highways to open conventional roads. For rare anomaly categories that appear on the road, 3D detection models trained on closed sets often misdetect or fail to detect anomaly objects. To address this risk, it is necessary to enhance the generalization ability of 3D detection models for targets of arbitrary shapes and to possess the capability to filter out anomalies. The generalization of 3D detection is limited by two factors: the coupled training of 2D and 3D, and the insufficient diversity in the scale distribution of training samples. This paper proposes a Stereo-based 3D Anomaly object Detection (S3AD) algorithm, which decouples the training strategy of 3D and 2D to release the generalization ability for arbitrary 3D foreground detection, and proposes an anomaly scoring algorithm based on foreground confidence prediction, achieving target-level anomaly scoring. In order to further verify and enhance the generalization of anomaly detection, we use a 3D rendering method to synthesize two augmented reality binocular stereo 3D detection datasets which named KITTI-AR. KITTI-AR extends upon KITTI by adding 97 new categories, totaling 6k pairs of stereo images. The KITTI-AR-ExD subset includes 39 common categories as extra training data to address the sparse sample distribution issue. Additionally, 58 rare categories form the KITTI-AR-OoD subset, which are not used in training to simulate zero-shot scenarios in real-world settings, solely for evaluating 3D anomaly detection. Finally, the performance of the algorithm and the dataset is verified in the experiments. (Code and dataset can be obtained at https://github.com/shiyi-mu/S3AD-Code).
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2025.
Builds on
48 of 85 references.
References · 48
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
- 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2022BEVDepth: Acquisition of Reliable Depth for Multi-view 3D Object Detectioncited by 572
36 more
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 528
- 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 503
- 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 489
- 2021PointCLIP: Point Cloud Understanding by CLIPcited by 463
- 2016Virtual Worlds as Proxy for Multi-Object Tracking Analysiscited by 341
- 2022BEVDet4D: Exploit Temporal Cues in Multi-camera 3D Object Detectioncited by 341
- 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
- 2022PointCLIP V2: Prompting CLIP and GPT for Powerful 3D Open-world Learningcited by 187
- 2021Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 185
- 2019Detecting the Unexpected via Image Resynthesiscited by 137
- 2022PromptDet: Towards Open-vocabulary Detection using Uncurated Imagescited by 133
- 20223D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 132
- 2016Lost and Found: Detecting Small Road Hazards for Self-Driving Vehiclescited by 117
- 2021Pixel-wise Anomaly Detection in Complex Driving Scenescited by 109
- 20213D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 106
- 2022Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 87
- 2022MonoDETR: Depth-guided Transformer for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 86
- 2021Geometry-based Distance Decomposition for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
- 2019Identifying Unknown Instances for Autonomous Drivingcited by 74
- 2022RbA: Segmenting Unknown Regions Rejected by Allcited by 67
- 2022Residual Pattern Learning for Pixel-wise Out-of-Distribution Detection in Semantic Segmentationcited by 55
- 2023Unmasking Anomalies in Road-Scene Segmentationcited by 45
- 2020Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimationcited by 43
- 2023Fast-BEV: A Fast and Strong Bird's-Eye View Perception Baselinecited by 40
- 2021YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detectioncited by 34
- 2020Detecting Road Obstacles by Erasing Themcited by 29
- 2021Open-set 3D Object Detectioncited by 29
- 2021Corner Cases for Visual Perception in Automated Driving: Some Guidance on Detection Approachescited by 27
- 2023Towards Domain Generalization for Multi-view 3D Object Detection in Bird-Eye-Viewcited by 27
- 2024Open Vocabulary Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 23
- 2024OV-Uni3DETR: Towards Unified Open-Vocabulary 3D Object Detection via Cycle-Modality Propagationcited by 19
- 2023Mask2Anomaly: Mask Transformer for Universal Open-set Segmentationcited by 18
- 2022PeSOTIF: a Challenging Visual Dataset for Perception SOTIF Problems in Long-tail Traffic Scenarioscited by 8
- 2022Boosting Monocular 3D Object Detection with Object-Centric Auxiliary Depth Supervisioncited by 7
- 2022SOTIF Entropy: Online SOTIF Risk Quantification and Mitigation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 5
- 2020Stereo RGB and Deeper LIDAR Based Network for 3D Object Detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.