mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assuring the Safety of Reinforcement Learning Components: AMLAS-RL

arXiv 2507.08848 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of machine learning (ML) has led to its increasing integration into cyber-physical systems (CPS) across diverse domains. While CPS offer powerful capabilities, incorporating ML components introduces significant safety and assurance challenges. Among ML techniques, reinforcement learning (RL) is particularly suited for CPS due to its capacity to handle complex, dynamic environments where explicit models of interaction between system and environment are unavailable or difficult to construct. However, in safety-critical applications, this learning process must not only be effective but demonstrably safe. Safe-RL methods aim to address this by incorporating safety constraints during learning, yet they fall short in providing systematic assurance across the RL lifecycle. The AMLAS methodology offers structured guidance for assuring the safety of supervised learning components, but it does not directly apply to the unique challenges posed by RL. In this paper, we adapt AMLAS to provide a framework for generating assurance arguments for an RL-enabled system through an iterative process; AMLAS-RL. We demonstrate AMLAS-RL using a running example of a wheeled vehicle tasked with reaching a target goal without collision.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

8 of 20 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
  2. 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 371
  3. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 333
  4. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 310
  5. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 141
  6. 2021Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)cited by 42
  7. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Vehicles through Parallel Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 35
  8. 2017An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Softwarecited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Evaluating Reinforcement Learning Safety and Trustworthiness in Cyber-Physical Systems
  2. 2024xSRL: Safety-Aware Explainable Reinforcement Learning -- Safety as a Product of Explainability
  3. 2023Datasets and Benchmarks for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applications
  5. 2024A Dynamic Safety Shield for Safe and Efficient Reinforcement Learning of Navigation Tasks
  6. 2026Evaluation Metrics for Safe Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Safe Reinforcement Learning using Ideas from Model Predictive Control
  8. 2026LexiSafe: Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning with Lexicographic Safety-Reward Hierarchy