mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

xSRL: Safety-Aware Explainable Reinforcement Learning -- Safety as a Product of Explainability

arXiv 2412.19311 ↗First posted 26 Dec 2024cs.AI cs.HC cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown great promise in simulated environments, such as games, where failures have minimal consequences. However, the deployment of RL agents in real-world systems such as autonomous vehicles, robotics, UAVs, and medical devices demands a higher level of safety and transparency, particularly when facing adversarial threats. Safe RL algorithms have been developed to address these concerns by optimizing both task performance and safety constraints. However, errors are inevitable, and when they occur, it is essential that the RL agents can also explain their actions to human operators. This makes trust in the safety mechanisms of RL systems crucial for effective deployment. Explainability plays a key role in building this trust by providing clear, actionable insights into the agent's decision-making process, ensuring that safety-critical decisions are well understood. While machine learning (ML) has seen significant advances in interpretability and visualization, explainability methods for RL remain limited. Current tools fail to address the dynamic, sequential nature of RL and its needs to balance task performance with safety constraints over time. The re-purposing of traditional ML methods, such as saliency maps, is inadequate for safety-critical RL applications where mistakes can result in severe consequences. To bridge this gap, we propose xSRL, a framework that integrates both local and global explanations to provide a comprehensive understanding of RL agents' behavior. xSRL also enables developers to identify policy vulnerabilities through adversarial attacks, offering tools to debug and patch agents without retraining. Our experiments and user studies demonstrate xSRL's effectiveness in increasing safety in RL systems, making them more reliable and trustworthy for real-world deployment. Code is available at https://github.com/risal-shefin/xSRL.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Assuring the Safety of Reinforcement Learning Components: AMLAS-RL
  2. 2026Explainably Safe Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Verification-Guided Falsification for Safe RL via Explainable Abstraction and Risk-Aware Exploration
  4. 2024Safety through Permissibility: Shield Construction for Fast and Safe Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2024Safe Reinforcement Learning in Black-Box Environments via Adaptive Shielding
  6. 2025Evaluating Reinforcement Learning Safety and Trustworthiness in Cyber-Physical Systems
  7. 2025Breaking the Safety-Capability Tradeoff: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Maintains Safety Guardrails in LLMs
  8. 2026RL-STPA: Adapting System-Theoretic Hazard Analysis for Safety-Critical Reinforcement Learning