mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalized and Unified Equivalences between Hardness and Pseudoentropy

arXiv 2507.05972 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.CC cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pseudoentropy characterizations give quantitatively precise formulations of the relationship between computational hardness and computational randomness. We prove a unified pseudoentropy characterization that generalizes and strengthens previous results in both uniform and nonuniform models of computation. Our characterization applies to a general family of entropy notions, including Shannon entropy and min-entropy as special cases. Moreover, the characterizations for these different entropy notions can be witnessed simultaneously by a single universal function, which captures both computational hardness and computational randomness. A key technical insight is that weight-restricted calibration, from the recent literature on algorithmic fairness, together with standard computational indistinguishability (known as multiaccuracy in the fairness literature), suffices for proving pseudoentropy characterizations for general entropy notions. To obtain this combination of properties, we prove an enhanced version of the Leakage Simulation Lemma (Jetchev and Pietrzak, 2014), which in turn extends the Complexity Theoretic-Regularity Lemma (Trevisan, Tulsiani, and Vadhan, 2009) from boolean functions to ones over a larger alphabet. Our Enhanced Regularity/Leakage-Simulation Lemma enables us to obtain an exponential improvement in the dependence on the alphabet size compared with the pseudoentropy characterizations of Casacuberta, Dwork, and Vadhan (2024), which are based on the stronger notion of multicalibration. We also show that this exponential dependence on the alphabet size is inevitable for multicalibration and even for the weaker notion of calibrated multiaccuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

14 of 41 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
  2. 2020Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 75
  3. 2021Omnipredictorscited by 74
  4. 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 62
  5. 2022Low-Degree Multicalibrationcited by 45
  6. 2025Near-Optimal Algorithms for Omnipredictioncited by 33
  7. 2023Complexity-Theoretic Implications of Multicalibrationcited by 16
  8. 2024On Computationally Efficient Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 16
  9. 2023From Pseudorandomness to Multi-Group Fairness and Backcited by 14
  10. 2025How Global Calibration Strengthens Multiaccuracycited by 8
  11. 2024Omnipredicting Single-Index Models with Multi-Index Modelscited by 7
  12. 2024Characterizing the Distinguishability of Product Distributions through Multicalibrationcited by 4
2 more
  1. 2015Simulating Auxiliary Inputs, Revisitedcited by 2
  2. 2023Generative Models of Huge Objectscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.