mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

AI Agent Smart Contract Exploit Generation

arXiv 2507.05558 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Smart contract vulnerabilities have led to billions in losses, yet finding actionable exploits remains challenging. Traditional fuzzers rely on rigid heuristics and struggle with complex attacks, while human auditors are thorough but slow and don't scale. Large Language Models offer a promising middle ground, combining human-like reasoning with machine speed. Early studies show that simply prompting LLMs generates unverified vulnerability speculations with high false positive rates. To address this, we present A1, an agentic system that transforms any LLM into an end-to-end exploit generator. A1 provides agents with six domain-specific tools for autonomous vulnerability discovery, from understanding contract behavior to testing strategies on real blockchain states. All outputs are concretely validated through execution, ensuring only profitable proof-of-concept exploits are reported. We evaluate A1 across 36 real-world vulnerable contracts on Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain. A1 achieves a 63% success rate on the VERITE benchmark. Across all successful cases, A1 extracts up to 8.59 million per exploit and 9.33 million total. Using Monte Carlo analysis of historical attacks, we demonstrate that immediate vulnerability detection yields 86-89% success probability, dropping to 6-21% with week-long delays. Our economic analysis reveals a troubling asymmetry: attackers achieve profitability at 6,000 exploit values while defenders require 60,000 -- raising fundamental questions about whether AI agents inevitably favor exploitation over defense.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

20 of 42 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contractscited by 88
  2. 2018Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart Contractscited by 61
  3. 2023Do you still need a manual smart contract audit?cited by 35
  4. 2018ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detectioncited by 32
  5. 2022SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Attackscited by 28
  6. 2018Finding The Greedy, Prodigal, and Suicidal Contracts at Scalecited by 19
  7. 2023Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Managementcited by 19
  8. 2018Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy Attackscited by 17
  9. 2023Blockchain Large Language Modelscited by 17
  10. 2021Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?cited by 15
  11. 2024ACFIX: Guiding LLMs with Mined Common RBAC Practices for Context-Aware Repair of Access Control Vulnerabilities in Smart Contractscited by 15
  12. 2019Harvey: A Greybox Fuzzer for Smart Contractscited by 10
8 more
  1. 2020High-Frequency Trading on Decentralized On-Chain Exchangescited by 10
  2. 2020Attacking the DeFi Ecosystem with Flash Loans for Fun and Profitcited by 9
  3. 2021On the Just-In-Time Discovery of Profit-Generating Transactions in DeFi Protocolscited by 6
  4. 2023EF/CF: High Performance Smart Contract Fuzzing for Exploit Generationcited by 3
  5. 2023ItyFuzz: Snapshot-Based Fuzzer for Smart Contractcited by 3
  6. 2024Are We There Yet? Unraveling the State-of-the-Art Smart Contract Fuzzerscited by 3
  7. 2025Smart Contract Fuzzing Towards Profitable Vulnerabilitiescited by 3
  8. 2025Generative Large Language Model usage in Smart Contract Vulnerability Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Detection: Agentic Attack Synthesis and Simulation for Smart Contracts
  2. 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
  3. 2024LLM-SmartAudit: Advanced Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
  4. 2026EvoPoC: Automated Exploit Synthesis for DeFi Smart Contracts via Hierarchical Knowledge Graphs ↗
  5. 2025Securing Smart Contract Languages with a Unified Agentic Framework for Vulnerability Repair in Solidity and Move
  6. 2025Multi-Agent Collaborative Fuzzing with Continuous Reflection for Smart Contracts Vulnerability Detection
  7. 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications
  8. 2026An Effective and Cost-Efficient Agentic Framework for Ethereum Smart Contract Auditing