On the Just-In-Time Discovery of Profit-Generating Transactions in DeFi Protocols
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we investigate two methods that allow us to automatically create profitable DeFi trades, one well-suited to arbitrage and the other applicable to more complicated settings. We first adopt the Bellman-Ford-Moore algorithm with DEFIPOSER-ARB and then create logical DeFi protocol models for a theorem prover in DEFIPOSER-SMT. While DEFIPOSER-ARB focuses on DeFi transactions that form a cycle and performs very well for arbitrage, DEFIPOSER-SMT can detect more complicated profitable transactions. We estimate that DEFIPOSER-ARB and DEFIPOSER-SMT can generate an average weekly revenue of 191.48ETH (76,592USD) and 72.44ETH (28,976USD) respectively, with the highest transaction revenue being 81.31ETH(32,524USD) and22.40ETH (8,960USD) respectively. We further show that DEFIPOSER-SMT finds the known economic bZx attack from February 2020, which yields 0.48M USD. Our forensic investigations show that this opportunity existed for 69 days and could have yielded more revenue if exploited one day earlier. Our evaluation spans 150 days, given 96 DeFi protocol actions, and 25 assets. Looking beyond the financial gains mentioned above, forks deteriorate the blockchain consensus security, as they increase the risks of double-spending and selfish mining. We explore the implications of DEFIPOSER-ARB and DEFIPOSER-SMT on blockchain consensus. Specifically, we show that the trades identified by our tools exceed the Ethereum block reward by up to 874x. Given optimal adversarial strategies provided by a Markov Decision Process (MDP), we quantify the value threshold at which a profitable transaction qualifies as Miner ExtractableValue (MEV) and would incentivize MEV-aware miners to fork the blockchain. For instance, we find that on Ethereum, a miner with a hash rate of 10% would fork the blockchain if an MEV opportunity exceeds 4x the block reward.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Blockchain Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2025AI Agent Smart Contract Exploit Generationcited by 9
- 2024Ethereum Fraud Detection via Joint Transaction Language Model and Graph Representation Learningcited by 8
- 2025Detecting Various DeFi Price Manipulations with LLM Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attackscited by 0
- 2026EVAGE: Autonomous MEV Generation and Adaptation via Multi-Agent Harnesscited by 0
- 2026EVAGE: Autonomous MEV Generation and Adaptation via Multi-Agent Harness23 Sep 2026
- 2026DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks10 Sep 2026
- 2025AI Agent Smart Contract Exploit Generation8 Jul 2025
- 2025Detecting Various DeFi Price Manipulations with LLM Reasoning17 Feb 2025
- 2024Ethereum Fraud Detection via Joint Transaction Language Model and Graph Representation Learning9 Sep 2024
- 2023Blockchain Large Language Models25 Apr 2023