mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Agent Reasoning for Cardiovascular Imaging Phenotype Analysis

arXiv 2507.03460 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2025cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying associations between imaging phenotypes, disease risk factors, and clinical outcomes is essential for understanding disease mechanisms. However, traditional approaches rely on human-driven hypothesis testing and selection of association factors, often overlooking complex, non-linear dependencies among imaging phenotypes and other multi-modal data. To address this, we introduce Multi-agent Exploratory Synergy for the Heart (MESHAgents): a framework that leverages large language models as agents to dynamically elicit, surface, and decide confounders and phenotypes in association studies. Specifically, we orchestrate a multi-disciplinary team of AI agents, which spontaneously generate and converge on insights through iterative, self-organizing reasoning. The framework dynamically synthesizes statistical correlations with multi-expert consensus, providing an automated pipeline for phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS). We demonstrate the system's capabilities through a population-based study of imaging phenotypes of the heart and aorta. MESHAgents autonomously uncovered correlations between imaging phenotypes and a wide range of non-imaging factors, identifying additional confounder variables beyond standard demographic factors. Validation on diagnosis tasks reveals that MESHAgents-discovered phenotypes achieve performance comparable to expert-selected phenotypes, with mean AUC differences as small as -0.004±0.010 on disease classification tasks. Notably, the recall score improves for 6 out of 9 disease types. Our framework provides clinically relevant imaging phenotypes with transparent reasoning, offering a scalable alternative to expert-driven methods.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2025.

Builds on

19 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning16 Nov
  2. 2022Can large language models reason about medical questions?17 Jul

Other references · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  6. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  7. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  8. 2023Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 352
  9. 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 246
  10. 2023Improving Language Model Negotiation with Self-Play and In-Context Learning from AI Feedbackcited by 202
  11. 2024OASIS: Open Agent Social Interaction Simulations with One Million Agentscited by 127
  12. 2024MMedAgent: Learning to Use Medical Tools with Multi-modal Agentcited by 108
5 more
  1. 2023AlpaCare:Instruction-tuned Large Language Models for Medical Applicationcited by 88
  2. 2024A personalized time-resolved 3D mesh generative model for unveiling normal heart dynamicscited by 17
  3. 2023CHeart: A Conditional Spatio-Temporal Generative Model for Cardiac Anatomycited by 13
  4. 2024RareAgents: Autonomous Multi-disciplinary Team for Rare Disease Diagnosis and Treatmentcited by 6
  5. 2024Truth or Deceit? A Bayesian Decoding Game Enhances Consistency and Reliabilitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VERITAS: A Multi-Agent Co-Scientist for Verifiable Image-Derived Hypothesis Testing ↗
  2. 2026HeartAgent: An Autonomous Agent System for Explainable Differential Diagnosis in Cardiology
  3. 2026SAGE: Agentic Framework for Interpretable and Clinically Translatable Computational Pathology Biomarker Discovery
  4. 2025CardAIc-Agents: A Multimodal Framework with Hierarchical Adaptation for Cardiac Care Support
  5. 2025A co-evolving agentic AI system for medical imaging analysis
  6. 2026MARCUS: An agentic, multimodal vision-language model for cardiac diagnosis and management
  7. 2026EchoAgent: Towards Reliable Echocardiography Interpretation with "Eyes","Hands" and "Minds"
  8. 2025Explainable Cross-Disease Reasoning for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment from Low-Dose Computed Tomography