mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning: Illustrating the use of Explainable Boosting Machines to Identify Overshooting Tops in Satellite Imagery

arXiv 2507.03183 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) algorithms have emerged in many meteorological applications. However, these algorithms struggle to extrapolate beyond the data they were trained on, i.e., they may adopt faulty strategies that lead to catastrophic failures. These failures are difficult to predict due to the opaque nature of ML algorithms. In high-stakes applications, such as severe weather forecasting, is is crucial to avoid such failures. One approach to address this issue is to develop more interpretable ML algorithms. The primary goal of this work is to illustrate the use of a specific interpretable ML algorithm that has not yet found much use in meteorology, Explainable Boosting Machines (EBMs). We demonstrate that EBMs are particularly suitable to implement human-guided strategies in an ML algorithm. As guiding example, we show how to develop an EBM to detect overshooting tops (OTs) in satellite imagery. EBMs require input features to be scalar. We use techniques from Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning to first extract scalar features from meteorological imagery. For the application of identifying OTs this includes extracting cloud texture from satellite imagery using Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrices. Once trained, the EBM was examined and minimally altered to more closely match strategies used by domain scientists to identify OTs. The result of our efforts is a fully interpretable ML algorithm developed in a human-machine collaboration that uses human-guided strategies. While the final model does not reach the accuracy of more complex approaches, it performs reasonably well and we hope paves the way for building more interpretable ML algorithms for this and other meteorological applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.

Builds on

16 of 84 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
  3. 2022FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 776
  4. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
  5. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
  6. 2019MultiResUNet : Rethinking the U-Net Architecture for Multimodal Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 195
  7. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 170
  8. 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 65
  9. 2019Physically Interpretable Neural Networks for the Geosciences: Applications to Earth System Variabilitycited by 44
  10. 2022Investigating the fidelity of explainable artificial intelligence methods for applications of convolutional neural networks in geosciencecited by 28
  11. 2023Finding the right XAI method -- A Guide for the Evaluation and Ranking of Explainable AI Methods in Climate Sciencecited by 27
  12. 2020Development and Interpretation of a Neural Network-Based Synthetic Radar Reflectivity Estimator Using GOES-R Satellite Observationscited by 17
4 more
  1. 2024Knowledge-guided Machine Learning: Current Trends and Future Prospectscited by 14
  2. 2021The Need for Ethical, Responsible, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Environmental Sciencescited by 12
  3. 2022Pest presence prediction using interpretable machine learningcited by 4
  4. 2023Physically Explainable Deep Learning for Convective Initiation Nowcasting Using GOES-16 Satellite Observationscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.