mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Need for Ethical, Responsible, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Environmental Sciences

arXiv 2112.08453 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2021cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods across all aspects of environmental sciences, it is imperative that we initiate a discussion about the ethical and responsible use of AI. In fact, much can be learned from other domains where AI was introduced, often with the best of intentions, yet often led to unintended societal consequences, such as hard coding racial bias in the criminal justice system or increasing economic inequality through the financial system. A common misconception is that the environmental sciences are immune to such unintended consequences when AI is being used, as most data come from observations, and AI algorithms are based on mathematical formulas, which are often seen as objective. In this article, we argue the opposite can be the case. Using specific examples, we demonstrate many ways in which the use of AI can introduce similar consequences in the environmental sciences. This article will stimulate discussion and research efforts in this direction. As a community, we should avoid repeating any foreseeable mistakes made in other domains through the introduction of AI. In fact, with proper precautions, AI can be a great tool to help it reduce climate and environmental injustice. We primarily focus on weather and climate examples but the conclusions apply broadly across the environmental sciences.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2021.

Builds on

8 of 83 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  3. 2021Skillful Precipitation Nowcasting using Deep Generative Models of Radarcited by 311
  4. 2021A Survey on Green Deep Learningcited by 52
  5. 2018Explanation Methods in Deep Learning: Users, Values, Concerns and Challengescited by 49
  6. 2019Machine Learning for Stochastic Parameterization: Generative Adversarial Networks in the Lorenz '96 Modelcited by 45
  7. 2018Adversarial Risk and Robustness: General Definitions and Implications for the Uniform Distributioncited by 32
  8. 2020Development and Interpretation of a Neural Network-Based Synthetic Radar Reflectivity Estimator Using GOES-R Satellite Observationscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

12 papers.