The Medium Is Not the Message: Deconfounding Document Embeddings via Linear Concept Erasure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Embedding-based similarity metrics between text sequences can be influenced not just by the content dimensions we most care about, but can also be biased by spurious attributes like the text's source or language. These document confounders cause problems for many applications, but especially those that need to pool texts from different corpora. This paper shows that a debiasing algorithm that removes information about observed confounders from the encoder representations substantially reduces these biases at a minimal computational cost. Document similarity and clustering metrics improve across every embedding variant and task we evaluate -- often dramatically. Interestingly, performance on out-of-distribution benchmarks is not impacted, indicating that the embeddings are not otherwise degraded.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2025.
Builds on
30 of 57 references.
References · 30
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
- 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 322
- 2023The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variantscited by 311
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
18 more
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 201
- 2020CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claimscited by 196
- 2021ContractNLI: A Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inference for Contractscited by 148
- 2021Samanantar: The Largest Publicly Available Parallel Corpora Collection for 11 Indic Languagescited by 136
- 2020XOR QA: Cross-lingual Open-Retrieval Question Answeringcited by 121
- 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
- 2019Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectivescited by 67
- 2021Unsupervised Learning of Debiased Representations with Pseudo-Attributescited by 44
- 2022Is Neural Topic Modelling Better than Clustering? An Empirical Study on Clustering with Contextual Embeddings for Topicscited by 35
- 2023MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understandingcited by 33
- 2025Training Sparse Mixture Of Experts Text Embedding Modelscited by 32
- 2019Plain English Summarization of Contractscited by 28
- 2021Factoring Statutory Reasoning as Language Understanding Challengescited by 20
- 2025ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Draftingcited by 11
- 2023Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizationscited by 9
- 2025mFollowIR: a Multilingual Benchmark for Instruction Following in Retrievalcited by 7
- 2025SCISSOR: Mitigating Semantic Bias through Cluster-Aware Siamese Networks for Robust Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.