mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Human-Centric Videos: Dataset and Model

arXiv 2607.16742 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Vision mixture-of-experts

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-generated human-centric videos play a crucial role in a wide range of modern applications. However, they often suffer from quality issues and semantic mismatches, underscoring the importance of effective quality assessment for such videos. To this end, we extend our previous dataset HVEval with pairwise preference annotations, resulting in HVEval+, the largest holistic quality assessment dataset for AI-generated human-centric videos, which comprises 1k prompts based on a comprehensive taxonomy, 20k videos generated by 24 text-to-video (T2V) models, and extensive human annotations, including 60k mean opinion scores (MOSs) and 60k preference pairs across 3 dimensions (i.e., spatial quality, temporal quality, and text-video correspondence), as well as 20k category-specific question-answer (Q&A) pairs. Along with the HVEval+ dataset, we further propose MoE-Rater, a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-inspired and multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based all-in-one method that supports multi-dimensional quality rating, multi-dimensional pairwise comparison, and category-specific question answering within a single model. Specifically, we introduce Mixture of Projector Experts (MoPE) and Mixture of LoRA Experts (MoLE), together with a three-stage training strategy consisting of task-aware pre-training, task-specific adaptation, and adaptive routing optimization, to effectively unify multiple tasks, resulting in superior performance on both HVEval+ and Human-AGVQA datasets. Extensive experiments and comprehensive analysis demonstrate the significant potential of the HVEval+ dataset and the MoE-Rater method in advancing AI-generated video quality assessment and further facilitating the evaluation and optimization of T2V models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Vision mixture-of-experts, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 81 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2026.

Builds on

81 of 118 references.

References · 81

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  4. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  5. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  6. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  7. 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,708
  8. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  9. 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,261
  10. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  11. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  12. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
38 more
  1. 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,660
  2. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
  3. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
  4. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
  5. 2023Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Modelscited by 1,062
  6. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  7. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  8. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
  9. 2024VideoLLaMA 2: Advancing Spatial-Temporal Modeling and Audio Understanding in Video-LLMscited by 771
  10. 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 733
  11. 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agentscited by 704
  12. 2023ModelScope Text-to-Video Technical Reportcited by 658
  13. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 610
  14. 2024LTX-Video: Realtime Video Latent Diffusioncited by 581
  15. 2024VideoCrafter2: Overcoming Data Limitations for High-Quality Video Diffusion Modelscited by 579
  16. 2024Latte: Latent Diffusion Transformer for Video Generationcited by 546
  17. 2025VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understandingcited by 518
  18. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 503
  19. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  20. 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 340
  21. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 320
  22. 2025VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulnesscited by 315
  23. 2023Show-1: Marrying Pixel and Latent Diffusion Models for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 302
  24. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
  25. 2025MAGI-1: Autoregressive Video Generation at Scalecited by 276
  26. 2025SkyReels-V2: Infinite-length Film Generative Modelcited by 229
  27. 2024T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video Generationcited by 185
  28. 2024Mixture of LoRA Expertscited by 181
  29. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  30. 2025Step-Video-T2V Technical Report: The Practice, Challenges, and Future of Video Foundation Modelcited by 168
  31. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  32. 2020UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Contentcited by 140
  33. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
  34. 2024DreamBench++: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for Personalized Image Generationcited by 131
  35. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 129
  36. 2023FETV: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of Open-Domain Text-to-Video Generationcited by 122
  37. 2022FineDiving: A Fine-grained Dataset for Procedure-aware Action Quality Assessmentcited by 107
  38. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100

50 most cited of 81 All 81 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LOVE: Benchmarking and Evaluating Text-to-Video Generation and Video-to-Text Interpretation
  2. 2025AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation
  3. 2025Q-Save: Towards Scoring and Attribution for Generated Video Evaluation
  4. 2025MVQA-68K: A Multi-dimensional and Causally-annotated Dataset with Quality Interpretability for Video Assessment
  5. 2025HumanVideo-MME: Benchmarking MLLMs for Human-Centric Video Understanding
  6. 2025UVE: Are MLLMs Unified Evaluators for AI-Generated Videos?
  7. 2025Multilevel Semantic-Aware Model for AI-Generated Video Quality Assessment
  8. 2025VideoScore2: Think before You Score in Generative Video Evaluation