Engineering Monosemanticity in Toy Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In some neural networks, individual neurons correspond to natural ``features'' in the input. Such monosemantic neurons are of great help in interpretability studies, as they can be cleanly understood. In this work we report preliminary attempts to engineer monosemanticity in toy models. We find that models can be made more monosemantic without increasing the loss by just changing which local minimum the training process finds. More monosemantic loss minima have moderate negative biases, and we are able to use this fact to engineer highly monosemantic models. We are able to mechanistically interpret these models, including the residual polysemantic neurons, and uncover a simple yet surprising algorithm. Finally, we find that providing models with more neurons per layer makes the models more monosemantic, albeit at increased computational cost. These findings point to a number of new questions and avenues for engineering monosemanticity, which we intend to study these in future work.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2022.
Builds on
2 of 11 references.
References · 2
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 74
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectorscited by 28
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretablecited by 22
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 11
- 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticitycited by 10
- 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalisecited by 8
- 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsitycited by 6
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2025Negative Pre-activations Differentiate Syntaxcited by 2
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameterscited by 2
1 more
- 2025Towards Integrated Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalise18 Feb 2026
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networks24 Nov 2025
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameters6 Oct 2025
- 2025Negative Pre-activations Differentiate Syntax29 Sep 2025
- 2025Towards Integrated Alignment8 Aug 2025
- 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticity24 Jun 2025
- 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretable5 Mar 2025
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencoder19 Feb 2025
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoders2 Nov 2024
- 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsity24 May 2024
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review22 Apr 2024
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probing2 May 2023
1 more
- 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectors19 Apr 2023
- 2025Towards Integrated Alignmentcited by 0
- 2025Towards Integrated Alignment8 Aug 2025
- 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretablecited by 22
- 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretable5 Mar 2025
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectorscited by 28
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 11
- 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticitycited by 10
- 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalisecited by 8
- 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsitycited by 6
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2025Negative Pre-activations Differentiate Syntaxcited by 2
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameterscited by 2
- 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalise18 Feb 2026
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networks24 Nov 2025
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameters6 Oct 2025
- 2025Negative Pre-activations Differentiate Syntax29 Sep 2025
- 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticity24 Jun 2025
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencoder19 Feb 2025
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoders2 Nov 2024
- 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsity24 May 2024
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review22 Apr 2024
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probing2 May 2023
- 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectors19 Apr 2023