mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Engineering Monosemanticity in Toy Models

arXiv 2211.09169 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In some neural networks, individual neurons correspond to natural ``features'' in the input. Such monosemantic neurons are of great help in interpretability studies, as they can be cleanly understood. In this work we report preliminary attempts to engineer monosemanticity in toy models. We find that models can be made more monosemantic without increasing the loss by just changing which local minimum the training process finds. More monosemantic loss minima have moderate negative biases, and we are able to use this fact to engineer highly monosemantic models. We are able to mechanistically interpret these models, including the residual polysemantic neurons, and uncover a simple yet surprising algorithm. Finally, we find that providing models with more neurons per layer makes the models more monosemantic, albeit at increased computational cost. These findings point to a number of new questions and avenues for engineering monosemanticity, which we intend to study these in future work.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2022.

Builds on

2 of 11 references.

References · 2

  1. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  2. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 74

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: