Learning from Emergence: A Study on Proactively Inhibiting the Monosemantic Neurons of Artificial Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, emergence has received widespread attention from the research community along with the success of large-scale models. Different from the literature, we hypothesize a key factor that promotes the performance during the increase of scale: the reduction of monosemantic neurons that can only form one-to-one correlations with specific features. Monosemantic neurons tend to be sparser and have negative impacts on the performance in large models. Inspired by this insight, we propose an intuitive idea to identify monosemantic neurons and inhibit them. However, achieving this goal is a non-trivial task as there is no unified quantitative evaluation metric and simply banning monosemantic neurons does not promote polysemanticity in neural networks. Therefore, we first propose a new metric to measure the monosemanticity of neurons with the guarantee of efficiency for online computation, then introduce a theoretically supported method to suppress monosemantic neurons and proactively promote the ratios of polysemantic neurons in training neural networks. We validate our conjecture that monosemanticity brings about performance change at different model scales on a variety of neural networks and benchmark datasets in different areas, including language, image, and physics simulation tasks. Further experiments validate our analysis and theory regarding the inhibition of monosemanticity.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.
Builds on
16 of 47 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,436
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
4 more
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
- 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 255
- 2017Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New Modelcited by 182
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedycited by 14
- 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticitycited by 10
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2025Signal in the Noise: Polysemantic Interference Transfers and Predicts Cross-Model Influencecited by 4
- 2024Sparse Prototype Network for Explainable Pedestrian Behavior Predictioncited by 0
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networks24 Nov 2025
- 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticity24 Jun 2025
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy19 Jun 2025
- 2025Signal in the Noise: Polysemantic Interference Transfers and Predicts Cross-Model Influence16 May 2025
- 2024Sparse Prototype Network for Explainable Pedestrian Behavior Prediction16 Oct 2024