Complexity Scaling Laws for Neural Models using Combinatorial Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work on neural scaling laws demonstrates that model performance scales predictably with compute budget, model size, and dataset size. In this work, we develop scaling laws based on problem complexity. We analyze two fundamental complexity measures: solution space size and representation space size. Using the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) as a case study, we show that combinatorial optimization promotes smooth cost trends, and therefore meaningful scaling laws can be obtained even in the absence of an interpretable loss. We then show that suboptimality grows predictably for fixed-size models when scaling the number of TSP nodes or spatial dimensions, independent of whether the model was trained with reinforcement learning or supervised fine-tuning on a static dataset. We conclude with an analogy to problem complexity scaling in local search, showing that a much simpler gradient descent of the cost landscape produces similar trends.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.
Builds on
45 of 76 references.
References · 45
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
- 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 734
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
33 more
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
- 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 483
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 272
- 2022Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Modelscited by 253
- 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 230
- 2022Multi-Game Decision Transformerscited by 214
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 210
- 2022Scaling Laws and Interpretability of Learning from Repeated Datacited by 152
- 2023Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Spacecited by 138
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
- 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 132
- 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 111
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 111
- 2022Broken Neural Scaling Lawscited by 109
- 2021NeuroLKH: Combining Deep Learning Model with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Heuristic for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 103
- 2021Deep Policy Dynamic Programming for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 94
- 2021From Motor Control to Team Play in Simulated Humanoid Footballcited by 87
- 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
- 2021Scaling Scaling Laws with Board Gamescited by 63
- 2021The Transformer Network for the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 59
- 2017Discrete Sequential Prediction of Continuous Actions for Deep RLcited by 51
- 2023Scaling Laws for Sparsely-Connected Foundation Modelscited by 43
- 2023Scaling laws for single-agent reinforcement learningcited by 41
- 2022Scaling Laws for a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Modelcited by 38
- 2023PED-ANOVA: Efficiently Quantifying Hyperparameter Importance in Arbitrary Subspacescited by 15
- 2020Fractional norms and quasinorms do not help to overcome the curse of dimensionalitycited by 13
- 2014Local Optima Networks: A New Model of Combinatorial Fitness Landscapescited by 11
- 2023Scaling Laws for Imitation Learning in Single-Agent Gamescited by 11
- 2024AlphaZero Neural Scaling and Zipf's Law: a Tale of Board Games and Power Lawscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025How to Upscale Neural Networks with Scaling Law? A Survey and Practical Guidelines
- 2026Leveraging Structural Constraints for Diffusion-based Neural TSP Solvers
- 2023DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial Optimization
- 2025Generative Modeling for Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning on the Traveling Salesman Problem
- 2025FrontierCO: Real-World and Large-Scale Evaluation of Machine Learning Solvers for Combinatorial Optimization
- 2024Self-Improvement for Neural Combinatorial Optimization: Sample without Replacement, but Improvement
- 2025Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural TSP Solvers
- 2025Neural Tractability via Structure: Learning-Augmented Algorithms for Graph Combinatorial Optimization