mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NeuroFilter: Activation-Based Guardrails for Privacy-Conscious LLM Agents

arXiv 2601.14660 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) are models able to reason, plan, and execute tools over unstructured data. These abilities enable transformative applications in domains spanning personal assistants, financial, and legal domains, etc. While these systems can substantially improve productivity and service quality, effective agency typically requires access to sensitive personal or organizational information. However, this access introduces critical inference-time privacy risks, specifically regarding contextually appropriate information disclosure. While recent studies highlight the inability of agentic LLMs to consistently adhere to privacy norms, existing defenses often rely on auxiliary LLM-based monitors. However, these defenses are expensive and offer limited protection against attacks that are robust to semantic censorship. To contrast this background, this paper proposes a notion of privacy filters based on activation probing. We show that these filters are both computationally efficient and effective for both single-turn and multi-turn conversational settings. Furthermore, this work provides the first systematic investigation into probing model internals across a conversation trajectory, moving beyond static, single-prompt analysis to capture the evolving state of privacy-sensitive interactions, illustrating their applicability across contexts, attack styles, multiple base models, and challenging settings such as mosaic attacks, while providing nuanced insights into the nature of the discovered concepts and modular construction of probes.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents22 Sep
  2. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents11 Jun

Other references · 16

  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  2. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  3. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 785
  4. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  5. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 390
  6. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 240
  7. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  8. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
  9. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115
  10. 2024Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learningcited by 67
  11. 2025Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probescited by 53
  12. 2024Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistantscited by 37
4 more
  1. 2024Breach By A Thousand Leaks: Unsafe Information Leakage in `Safe' AI Responsescited by 18
  2. 2025Unsupervised Concept Vector Extraction for Bias Control in LLMscited by 7
  3. 2024FRACTURED-SORRY-Bench: Framework for Revealing Attacks in Conversational Turns Undermining Refusal Efficacy and Defenses over SORRY-Bench (Automated Multi-shot Jailbreaks)cited by 6
  4. 2025On Surjectivity of Neural Networks: Can you elicit any behavior from your model?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning
  2. 2024Empowering Users in Digital Privacy Management through Interactive LLM-Based Agents
  3. 2026Confuse the Model, Control the Flow: Understanding and Mitigating Privacy Leakage from LLM Agents with Information Flow Control
  4. 2024Privacy Leakage Overshadowed by Views of AI: A Study on Human Oversight of Privacy in Language Model Agent
  5. 2023"It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agents
  6. 2025MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
  7. 2026Privacy Control in Conversational LLM Platforms: A Walkthrough Study
  8. 2026Loose Lips: Understanding Privacy Leakage in Agentic Dialogue