mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis to Probe Convergence in Physics-informed Neural Solvers: PIKANs vs. PINNs

arXiv 2506.07958 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2025cs.LG math-ph math.APcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (PIKANs), and in particular their Chebyshev-based variants (cPIKANs), have recently emerged as promising models for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). However, their training dynamics and convergence behavior remain largely unexplored both theoretically and numerically. In this work, we aim to advance the theoretical understanding of cPIKANs by analyzing them using Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory. Our objective is to discern the evolution of kernel structure throughout gradient-based training and its subsequent impact on learning efficiency. We first derive the NTK of standard cKANs in a supervised setting, and then extend the analysis to the physics-informed context. We analyze the spectral properties of NTK matrices, specifically their eigenvalue distributions and spectral bias, for four representative PDEs: the steady-state Helmholtz equation, transient diffusion and Allen-Cahn equations, and forced vibrations governed by the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation. We also conduct an investigation into the impact of various optimization strategies, e.g., first-order, second-order, and hybrid approaches, on the evolution of the NTK and the resulting learning dynamics. Results indicate a tractable behavior for NTK in the context of cPIKANs, which exposes learning dynamics that standard physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) cannot capture. Spectral trends also reveal when domain decomposition improves training, directly linking kernel behavior to convergence rates under different setups. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic NTK study of cPIKANs, providing theoretical insight that clarifies and predicts their empirical performance.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.

Builds on

29 of 96 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  3. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
  4. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  6. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
  7. 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 433
  8. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 320
  9. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
  10. 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 250
  11. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  12. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 222
17 more
  1. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  2. 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
  3. 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks are Radial Basis Function Networkscited by 128
  4. 2024Wav-KAN: Wavelet Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 122
  5. 2024Chebyshev Polynomial-Based Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: An Efficient Architecture for Nonlinear Function Approximationcited by 118
  6. 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 104
  7. 2020The Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem revisitedcited by 89
  8. 2023Tackling the Curse of Dimensionality with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 79
  9. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 76
  10. 2020Analyzing Finite Neural Networks: Can We Trust Neural Tangent Kernel Theory?cited by 33
  11. 2022ExSpliNet: An interpretable and expressive spline-based neural networkcited by 33
  12. 2022Neural Tangent Kernel Beyond the Infinite-Width Limit: Effects of Depth and Initializationcited by 30
  13. 2022Critical Investigation of Failure Modes in Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 15
  14. 2023On the Optimal Expressive Power of ReLU DNNs and Its Application in Approximation with Kolmogorov Superposition Theoremcited by 13
  15. 2024EPi-cKANs: Elasto-Plasticity Informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Using Chebyshev Polynomialscited by 9
  16. 2025Applications of Entropy in Data Analysis and Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 3
  17. 2022Neural tangent kernel analysis of PINN for advection-diffusion equationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.