Convergence and Sketching-Based Efficient Computation of Neural Tangent Kernel Weights in Physics-Based Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multi-objective optimization, multiple loss terms are weighted and added together to form a single objective. These weights are chosen to properly balance the competing losses according to some meta-goal. For example, in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), these weights are often adaptively chosen to improve the network's generalization error. A popular choice of adaptive weights is based on the neural tangent kernel (NTK) of the PINN, which describes the evolution of the network in predictor space during training. The convergence of such an adaptive weighting algorithm is not clear a priori. Moreover, these NTK-based weights would be updated frequently during training, further increasing the computational burden of the learning process. In this paper, we prove that under appropriate conditions, gradient descent enhanced with adaptive NTK-based weights is convergent in a suitable sense. We then address the problem of computational efficiency by developing a randomized algorithm inspired by a predictor-corrector approach and matrix sketching, which produces unbiased estimates of the NTK up to an arbitrarily small discretization error. Finally, we provide numerical experiments to support our theoretical findings and to show the efficacy of our randomized algorithm. Code Availability: https://github.com/maxhirsch/Efficient-NTK
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.
Builds on
16 of 41 references.
References · 16
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
- 2018AdaGrad stepsizes: Sharp convergence over nonconvex landscapescited by 182
- 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks with Many Channels are Gaussian Processescited by 164
- 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 64
- 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
- 2021Scaling Neural Tangent Kernels via Sketching and Random Featurescited by 32
- 2024Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?cited by 31
- 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
- 2025Combining physics-based and data-driven models: advancing the frontiers of research with Scientific Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2025Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis to Probe Convergence in Physics-informed Neural Solvers: PIKANs vs. PINNscited by 9
4 more
- 2024Is the neural tangent kernel of PINNs deep learning general partial differential equations always convergent ?cited by 5
- 2024Neural empirical interpolation method for nonlinear model reductioncited by 4
- 2021Fast Graph Neural Tangent Kernel via Kronecker Sketchingcited by 2
- 2025Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methods for Wide Two-Layer Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Poisson Equationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.