Neural tangent kernel analysis of PINN for advection-diffusion equation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) numerically approximate the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) by incorporating the residual of the PDE along with its initial/boundary conditions into the loss function. In spite of their partial success, PINNs are known to struggle even in simple cases where the closed-form analytical solution is available. In order to better understand the learning mechanism of PINNs, this work focuses on a systematic analysis of PINNs for the linear advection-diffusion equation (LAD) using the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory. Thanks to the NTK analysis, the effects of the advection speed/diffusion parameter on the training dynamics of PINNs are studied and clarified. We show that the training difficulty of PINNs is a result of 1) the so-called spectral bias, which leads to difficulty in learning high-frequency behaviours; and 2) convergence rate disparity between different loss components that results in training failure. The latter occurs even in the cases where the solution of the underlying PDE does not exhibit high-frequency behaviour. Furthermore, we observe that this training difficulty manifests itself, to some extent, differently in advection-dominated and diffusion-dominated regimes. Different strategies to address these issues are also discussed. In particular, it is demonstrated that periodic activation functions can be used to partly resolve the spectral bias issue.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
- 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
- 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 368
8 more
- 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
- 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 156
- 2020Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard Equations using the Adaptive Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 123
- 2019PPINN: Parareal Physics-Informed Neural Network for time-dependent PDEscited by 118
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 102
- 2021Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problemscited by 102
- 2021Learning in Sinusoidal Spaces with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 62
- 2021Error analysis for physics informed neural networks (PINNs) approximating Kolmogorov PDEscited by 57
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.