Cross-Entropy Games for Language Models: From Implicit Knowledge to General Capability Measures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) define probability measures on text. By considering the implicit knowledge question of what it means for an LLM to know such a measure and what it entails algorithmically, we are naturally led to formulate a series of tasks that go beyond generative sampling, involving forms of summarization, counterfactual thinking, anomaly detection, originality search, reverse prompting, debating, creative solving, etc. These tasks can be formulated as games based on LLM measures, which we call Cross-Entropy (Xent) Games. Xent Games can be single-player or multi-player. They involve cross-entropy scores and cross-entropy constraints, and can be expressed as simple computational graphs and programs. We show the Xent Game space is large enough to contain a wealth of interesting examples, while being constructible from basic game-theoretic consistency axioms. We then discuss how the Xent Game space can be used to measure the abilities of LLMs. This leads to the construction of Xent Game measures: finite families of Xent Games that can be used as capability benchmarks, built from a given scope, by extracting a covering measure. To address the unbounded scope problem associated with the challenge of measuring general abilities, we propose to explore the space of Xent Games in a coherent fashion, using ideas inspired by evolutionary dynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2025.
Builds on
28 of 50 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 356
- 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 310
- 2025ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systemscited by 190
- 2024Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 186
- 2015Actor-Mimic: Deep Multitask and Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
- 2025REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 130
16 more
- 2024AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environmentscited by 120
- 2020If beam search is the answer, what was the question?cited by 116
- 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 116
- 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
- 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMscited by 114
- 2023A Tutorial on Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
- 2019AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligencecited by 86
- 2024Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligencecited by 80
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Data Augmentationcited by 40
- 2024A Survey of Useful LLM Evaluationcited by 29
- 2024Arrows of Time for Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2023A Definition of Open-Ended Learning Problems for Goal-Conditioned Agentscited by 18
- 2016Compositional game theorycited by 13
- 2025When does a predictor know its own loss?cited by 7
- 2021Smart Proofs via Smart Contracts: Succinct and Informative Mathematical Derivations via Decentralized Marketscited by 2
- 2023Meta-Diversity Search in Complex Systems, A Recipe for Artificial Open-Endedness ?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.