Weisfeiler and Leman Go Gambling: Why Expressive Lottery Tickets Win
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH) is well-studied for convolutional neural networks but has been validated only empirically for graph neural networks (GNNs), for which theoretical findings are largely lacking. In this paper, we identify the expressivity of sparse subnetworks, i.e. their ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs, as crucial for finding winning tickets that preserve the predictive performance. We establish conditions under which the expressivity of a sparsely initialized GNN matches that of the full network, particularly when compared to the Weisfeiler-Leman test, and in that context put forward and prove a Strong Expressive Lottery Ticket Hypothesis. We subsequently show that an increased expressivity in the initialization potentially accelerates model convergence and improves generalization. Our findings establish novel theoretical foundations for both LTH and GNN research, highlighting the importance of maintaining expressivity in sparsely initialized GNNs. We illustrate our results using examples from drug discovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
30 of 58 references.
References · 30
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
- 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
- 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2019On the equivalence between graph isomorphism testing and function approximation with GNNscited by 172
- 2023On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topologycited by 166
18 more
- 2021Weisfeiler and Leman go Machine Learning: The Story so farcited by 122
- 2021A Unified Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2022Not too little, not too much: a theoretical analysis of graph (over)smoothingcited by 106
- 2014Propagation Kernelscited by 88
- 2022Theory of Graph Neural Networks: Representation and Learningcited by 61
- 2023Neural Injective Functions for Multisets, Measures and Graphs via a Finite Witness Theoremcited by 34
- 2024A Survey of Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 24
- 2023Rethinking Graph Lottery Tickets: Graph Sparsity Matterscited by 23
- 2021The Power of the Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm for Machine Learning with Graphscited by 19
- 2021You are caught stealing my winning lottery ticket! Making a lottery ticket claim its ownershipcited by 18
- 2020Multi-Precision Policy Enforced Training (MuPPET): A precision-switching strategy for quantised fixed-point training of CNNscited by 11
- 2021A Generalized Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernelcited by 9
- 2021Adaptive Precision Training (AdaPT): A dynamic fixed point quantized training approach for DNNscited by 8
- 2024Expressive Power of Temporal Message Passingcited by 7
- 2023The Graph Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Informative Graph Structurecited by 6
- 2023On the Two Sides of Redundancy in Graph Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2025On the Relationship Between Robustness and Expressivity of Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2023Multicoated and Folded Graph Neural Networks with Strong Lottery Ticketscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.