mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Two Sides of Redundancy in Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2310.04190 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Message passing neural networks iteratively generate node embeddings by aggregating information from neighboring nodes. With increasing depth, information from more distant nodes is included. However, node embeddings may be unable to represent the growing node neighborhoods accurately and the influence of distant nodes may vanish, a problem referred to as oversquashing. Information redundancy in message passing, i.e., the repetitive exchange and encoding of identical information amplifies oversquashing. We develop a novel aggregation scheme based on neighborhood trees, which allows for controlling redundancy by pruning redundant branches of unfolding trees underlying standard message passing. While the regular structure of unfolding trees allows the reuse of intermediate results in a straightforward way, the use of neighborhood trees poses computational challenges. We propose compact representations of neighborhood trees and merge them, exploiting computational redundancy by identifying isomorphic subtrees. From this, node and graph embeddings are computed via a neural architecture inspired by tree canonization techniques. Our method is less susceptible to oversquashing than traditional message passing neural networks and can improve the accuracy on widely used benchmark datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  4. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
  5. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 877
  6. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
  7. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
  8. 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 478
  9. 2019MixHop: Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Architectures via Sparsified Neighborhood Mixingcited by 443
  10. 2019Provably Powerful Graph Networkscited by 389
  11. 2020Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networkscited by 296
  12. 2019A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classificationcited by 244
13 more
  1. 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 198
  2. 2021Identity-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 198
  3. 2023On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topologycited by 166
  4. 2019Relational Pooling for Graph Representationscited by 150
  5. 2023Understanding Oversquashing in GNNs through the Lens of Effective Resistancecited by 97
  6. 2022On the Trade-off between Over-smoothing and Over-squashing in Deep Graph Neural Networkscited by 64
  7. 2022Theory of Graph Neural Networks: Representation and Learningcited by 61
  8. 2016On Valid Optimal Assignment Kernels and Applications to Graph Classificationcited by 49
  9. 2022Shortest Path Networks for Graph Property Predictioncited by 46
  10. 2023Path Neural Networks: Expressive and Accurate Graph Neural Networkscited by 32
  11. 2021SPAGAN: Shortest Path Graph Attention Networkcited by 28
  12. 2022Weisfeiler and Leman Go Walking: Random Walk Kernels Revisitedcited by 9
  13. 2022Weisfeiler and Leman go Hyperbolic: Learning Distance Preserving Node Representationscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.