mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Graph Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Informative Graph Structure

arXiv 2312.04762 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.SIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph learning methods help utilize implicit relationships among data items, thereby reducing training label requirements and improving task performance. However, determining the optimal graph structure for a particular learning task remains a challenging research problem. In this work, we introduce the Graph Lottery Ticket (GLT) Hypothesis - that there is an extremely sparse backbone for every graph, and that graph learning algorithms attain comparable performance when trained on that subgraph as on the full graph. We identify and systematically study 8 key metrics of interest that directly influence the performance of graph learning algorithms. Subsequently, we define the notion of a "winning ticket" for graph structure - an extremely sparse subset of edges that can deliver a robust approximation of the entire graph's performance. We propose a straightforward and efficient algorithm for finding these GLTs in arbitrary graphs. Empirically, we observe that performance of different graph learning algorithms can be matched or even exceeded on graphs with the average degree as low as 5.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

Builds on

25 of 60 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  5. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
  6. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
  7. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
  8. 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 584
  9. 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 478
  10. 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
  11. 2020A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networkscited by 249
  12. 2017Cooperative Game Theory Approaches for Network Partitioningcited by 135
13 more
  1. 2021A Unified Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
  2. 2022FoSR: First-order spectral rewiring for addressing oversquashing in GNNscited by 105
  3. 2022DiffWire: Inductive Graph Rewiring via the Lov'asz Boundcited by 79
  4. 2022Expander Graph Propagationcited by 75
  5. 2022GraphWorld: Fake Graphs Bring Real Insights for GNNscited by 56
  6. 2018VERSE: Versatile Graph Embeddings from Similarity Measurescited by 54
  7. 2022Oversquashing in GNNs through the lens of information contraction and graph expansioncited by 53
  8. 2020The impossibility of low rank representations for triangle-rich complex networkscited by 32
  9. 2020Node Embeddings and Exact Low-Rank Representations of Complex Networkscited by 21
  10. 2021Hierarchical Agglomerative Graph Clustering in Nearly-Linear Timecited by 8
  11. 2017An almost-linear time algorithm for uniform random spanning tree generationcited by 6
  12. 2015Unwinding the hairball graph: pruning algorithms for weighted complex networkscited by 3
  13. 2022Spectral Graph Complexitycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

6 papers.