Quantum Perceptron Revisited: Computational-Statistical Tradeoffs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum machine learning algorithms could provide significant speed-ups over their classical counterparts; however, whether they could also achieve good generalization remains unclear. Recently, two quantum perceptron models which give a quadratic improvement over the classical perceptron algorithm using Grover's search have been proposed by Wiebe et al. arXiv:1602.04799 . While the first model reduces the complexity with respect to the size of the training set, the second one improves the bound on the number of mistakes made by the perceptron. In this paper, we introduce a hybrid quantum-classical perceptron algorithm with lower complexity and better generalization ability than the classical perceptron. We show a quadratic improvement over the classical perceptron in both the number of samples and the margin of the data. We derive a bound on the expected error of the hypothesis returned by our algorithm, which compares favorably to the one obtained with the classical online perceptron. We use numerical experiments to illustrate the trade-off between computational complexity and statistical accuracy in quantum perceptron learning and discuss some of the key practical issues surrounding the implementation of quantum perceptron models into near-term quantum devices, whose practical implementation represents a serious challenge due to inherent noise. However, the potential benefits make correcting this worthwhile.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2021.
Builds on
13 of 39 references.
References · 13
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2017Quantum machine learning: a classical perspectivecited by 95
- 2016Quantum Recommendation Systemscited by 69
- 2018q-means: A quantum algorithm for unsupervised machine learningcited by 55
- 2016Quantum Perceptron Modelscited by 27
- 2019Sublinear quantum algorithms for training linear and kernel-based classifierscited by 19
- 2020Quantum Banditscited by 18
- 2014Simulating a perceptron on a quantum computercited by 16
- 2019Quantum Expectation-Maximization for Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 8
- 2020Quantum Boostingcited by 8
- 2013Perceptron Mistake Boundscited by 5
- 2020Quantum Machine Learning Algorithm for Knowledge Graphscited by 4
1 more
- 2019The Grover search as a naturally occurring phenomenoncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
5 papers.
- 2024Generalization Error Bound for Quantum Machine Learning in NISQ Era -- A Surveycited by 7
- 2025Evaluating the Potential of Quantum Machine Learning in Cybersecurity: A Case-Study on PCA-based Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 2
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classescited by 0
- 2025On Quantum Perceptron Learning via Quantum Searchcited by 0
- 2025Position: Quantum Kernel Machines Should Move Beyond Scalar-Valued Kernels to Realize Their Potentialcited by 0
- 2025Position: Quantum Kernel Machines Should Move Beyond Scalar-Valued Kernels to Realize Their Potential4 Jun 2025
- 2025On Quantum Perceptron Learning via Quantum Search21 Mar 2025
- 2025Evaluating the Potential of Quantum Machine Learning in Cybersecurity: A Case-Study on PCA-based Intrusion Detection Systems16 Feb 2025
- 2024Generalization Error Bound for Quantum Machine Learning in NISQ Era -- A Survey11 Sep 2024
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classes21 Aug 2023