mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Preference Optimization via Dynamic Target Margins

arXiv 2506.03690 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 13

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

The alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for ensuring their safety and reliability in practical applications. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as an efficient method that directly optimizes models using preference pairs, significantly reducing resource demands. However, the effectiveness of DPO heavily depends on the data quality, which is frequently compromised by noise. In this work, we propose γ-PO, a dynamic target margin preference optimization algorithm that adjust reward margins at the pairwise level. By introducing instance-specific margin calibration, γ-PO strategically prioritizes high-confidence pairs (those demonstrating higher reward margins) while suppressing potential noise from ambiguous pairs. Moreover, γ-PO is a plug-and-play method, compatible with variants of DPO that rely on reward margin between preference pairs. Across benchmarks such as AlpacaEval2 and Arena-Hard, γ-PO achieves an average 4.4% improvement over other baselines, setting new benchmarks for state-of-the-art performance. Additionally, γ-PO requires minimal code changes and has a negligible impact on training efficiency, making it a robust solution for enhancing LLMs alignment. Our codes are available at hrefhttps://github.com/sunjie279/gammaPOhttps://github.com/sunjie279/gammaPO.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

36 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Larger or Smaller Reward Margins to Select Preferences for Alignment?25 Feb
  2. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization14 Oct
  3. 2024RainbowPO: A Unified Framework for Combining Improvements in Preference Optimization5 Oct
  4. 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic β11 Jul
  5. 2024Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization10 Jul
  6. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization17 Jun
  7. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  8. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
  9. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  10. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
  11. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset16 Feb
  12. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
4 more
  1. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  2. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
  3. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  9. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  10. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  11. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  12. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
8 more
  1. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  2. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
  3. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  4. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow with Deep Learning and Tree Searchcited by 252
  5. 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 136
  6. 2024GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local Refinementscited by 103
  7. 2020Beyond User Self-Reported Likert Scale Ratings: A Comparison Model for Automatic Dialog Evaluationcited by 22
  8. 2022DSLA: Dynamic smooth label assignment for efficient anchor-free object detectioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Margin Adaptive DPO: Leveraging Reward Model for Granular Control in Preference Optimization
  2. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
  3. 2024Margin Matching Preference Optimization: Enhanced Model Alignment with Granular Feedback
  4. 2026Small-Margin Preferences Still Matter-If You Train Them Right
  5. 2024ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models
  6. 2024Multi-Preference Optimization: Generalizing DPO via Set-Level Contrasts
  7. 2025Provably Convergent Primal-Dual DPO for Constrained LLM Alignment
  8. 2024Aligning CodeLLMs with Direct Preference Optimization