mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CompassDPO: Dynamics-Controlled Direct Preference Optimization for Robust Safety Alignment

arXiv 2603.07211 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a standard framework for safety alignment, but its reliance on pairwise preference updates makes training sensitive to imperfect supervision. Existing robust DPO methods often address this sensitivity through global loss corrections or external data-level interventions, while largely overlooking how unreliable comparisons distort batch-level optimization dynamics. We propose CompassDPO, a reward-free DPO framework that stabilizes preference optimization through dynamics control. Using the implicit DPO reward margin as a training-time compass, CompassDPO regulates sample influence along two complementary axes: update direction and update magnitude. For directional control, it applies sparse, budgeted, and warm-up delayed loss mixing to attenuate update components that conflict with the emerging preference direction. For magnitude control, it adaptively soft-winsorizes high-loss tail contributions, reducing tail dominance while preserving useful gradients from hard examples. Both mechanisms use only signals available during standard DPO training and require no external reward model or additional supervision. Experiments on PKU-SafeRLHF across four backbones and multiple out-of-distribution safety benchmarks show that CompassDPO consistently improves robustness over vanilla DPO and strong DPO-family baselines, especially under controlled label-flip noise. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CompassDPO-4D00

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.

Builds on

20 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Revisiting Robustness for LLM Safety Alignment via Selective Geometry Control7 Feb
  2. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset10 Jul

Other references · 18

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  7. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  8. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  9. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
  10. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
  11. 2024SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 225
  12. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 176
6 more
  1. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 133
  2. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offsetcited by 122
  3. 2024Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 50
  4. 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparisoncited by 20
  5. 2025Robust Preference Optimization via Dynamic Target Marginscited by 13
  6. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PREFINE: Preference-Based Implicit Reward and Cost Fine-Tuning for Safety Alignment
  2. 2025More is Less: The Pitfalls of Multi-Model Synthetic Preference Data in DPO Safety Alignment
  3. 2026Improving Safety Alignment via Balanced Direct Preference Optimization
  4. 2024As Simple as Fine-tuning: LLM Alignment via Bidirectional Negative Feedback Loss
  5. 2026BSO: Safety Alignment Is Density Ratio Matching
  6. 2024Alignment with Preference Optimization Is All You Need for LLM Safety
  7. 2025SafeDPO: A Simple Approach to Direct Preference Optimization with Enhanced Safety
  8. 2026DOG-DPO:Dynamic Optimization in Geometry for Safety Alignment