NetArena: Dynamic Benchmarks for AI Agents in Network Automation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI agents expand into high-stakes domains like network system operations, evaluating their real-world reliability becomes increasingly critical. However, existing benchmarks risk contamination due to static design, show high statistical variance from limited dataset size, and fail to reflect the complexity of production environments. We present NetArena, a dynamic benchmark generation framework for network applications. NetArena introduces a novel abstraction and unified interface that generalize across diverse tasks, enabling dynamic benchmarking despite the heterogeneity of network workloads. At runtime, users can generate unlimited queries on demand. NetArena integrates with network emulators to measure correctness, safety, and latency during execution. We demonstrate NetArena on three representative applications and find that (1) NetArena significantly improves statistical reliability across AI agents, reducing confidence-interval overlap from 85% to 0, (2) agents achieve only 13-38% average performance (as low as 3%) for large-scale, realistic queries, and (3) it exposes more fine-grained behaviors that static, correctness-only benchmarks miss. NetArena also enables use cases such as SFT and RL fine-tuning on network system tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/Froot-NetSys/NetArena.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.
Builds on
54 of 74 references.
References · 54
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
38 more
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 438
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmeticcited by 191
- 2023Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Modelscited by 177
- 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 175
- 2023Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 142
- 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 138
- 2025MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agentscited by 124
- 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmarkcited by 123
- 2024Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 122
- 2023SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific Researchcited by 115
- 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 101
- 2023Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymorecited by 99
- 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
- 2023Automatic Root Cause Analysis via Large Language Models for Cloud Incidentscited by 84
- 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 75
- 2023Skill-Mix: a Flexible and Expandable Family of Evaluations for AI modelscited by 64
- 2024Exploring LLM-based Agents for Root Cause Analysiscited by 61
- 2023LatestEval: Addressing Data Contamination in Language Model Evaluation through Dynamic and Time-Sensitive Test Constructioncited by 58
- 2021Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation Benchmarkingcited by 53
- 2024SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositoriescited by 52
- 2025ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Taskscited by 51
- 2023Estimating Contamination via Perplexity: Quantifying Memorisation in Language Model Evaluationcited by 48
- 2025AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Cloudscited by 40
- 2022Adaptive Testing of Computer Vision Modelscited by 39
- 2025Recent Advances in Large Langauge Model Benchmarks against Data Contamination: From Static to Dynamic Evaluationcited by 38
- 2024KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graphcited by 26
- 2023Enhancing Network Management Using Code Generated by Large Language Modelscited by 20
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJackcited by 14
- 2026TimeClaw: A Time-Series AI Agent with Exploratory Execution Learningcited by 2
- 2026NetConfArena: An Executable Benchmark for LLM Agents in Closed-Loop Network Configurationcited by 1
- 2026FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Ticketscited by 1
- 2026Pramana: A Composable, Domain-Specific Backend for Empirical Networking Researchcited by 0
- 2026CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operationscited by 0
- 2026Safety Signals to Verify NetOps Agents with Action-Level Granularitycited by 0
- 2026FDE-Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Deployment Environment Configurationcited by 0
- 2026SoK: Semantic Decision Engines in Network Control Loopscited by 0
- 2026SoK: Semantic Decision Engines in Network Control Loops5 Oct 2026
- 2026FDE-Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Deployment Environment Configuration23 Sep 2026
- 2026Safety Signals to Verify NetOps Agents with Action-Level Granularity13 Sep 2026
- 2026FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets27 Aug 2026
- 2026NetConfArena: An Executable Benchmark for LLM Agents in Closed-Loop Network Configuration24 Aug 2026
- 2026CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operations12 Aug 2026
- 2026Pramana: A Composable, Domain-Specific Backend for Empirical Networking Research28 Jul 2026
- 2026Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack12 May 2026
- 2026TimeClaw: A Time-Series AI Agent with Exploratory Execution Learning11 May 2026