OASIS: Online Sample Selection for Continual Visual Instruction Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In continual instruction tuning (CIT) scenarios, where new instruction tuning data continuously arrive in an online streaming manner, training delays from large-scale data significantly hinder real-time adaptation. Data selection can mitigate this overhead, but existing strategies often rely on pretrained reference models, which are impractical in CIT setups since future data are unknown. Recent reference model-free online sample selection methods address this, but typically select a fixed number of samples per batch (e.g., top-k), making them vulnerable to distribution shifts where informativeness varies across batches. To address these limitations, we propose OASIS, an adaptive online sample selection approach for CIT that (1) selects informative samples by estimating each sample's informativeness relative to all previously seen data, beyond batch-level constraints, and (2) minimizes informative redundancy of selected samples through iterative selection score updates. Experiments on various large foundation models show that OASIS, using only 25 percent of the data, achieves comparable performance to full-data training and outperforms the state-of-the-art sampling methods.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.
Builds on
62 of 87 references.
References · 62
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2023mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodalitycited by 1,038
- 2023Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magiccited by 891
- 2023MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editingcited by 615
38 more
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2020PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 467
- 2018DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answeringcited by 338
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
- 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 295
- 2021Rainbow Memory: Continual Learning with a Memory of Diverse Samplescited by 273
- 2021IconQA: A New Benchmark for Abstract Diagram Understanding and Visual Language Reasoningcited by 262
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 233
- 2023Progressive Prompts: Continual Learning for Language Modelscited by 195
- 2024HQ-Edit: A High-Quality Dataset for Instruction-based Image Editingcited by 191
- 2022Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Ratescited by 115
- 2022NumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning Taskscited by 110
- 2022MultiInstruct: Improving Multi-Modal Zero-Shot Learning via Instruction Tuningcited by 109
- 2018Adapting Auxiliary Losses Using Gradient Similaritycited by 98
- 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
- 2023MeetingBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Meeting Summarizationcited by 81
- 2023Trillion Dollar Words: A New Financial Dataset, Task & Market Analysiscited by 73
- 2021Online Continual Learning on Class Incremental Blurry Task Configuration with Anytime Inferencecited by 66
- 2023Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learningcited by 58
- 2023Continual Instruction Tuning for Large Multimodal Modelscited by 49
- 2023Real-Time Evaluation in Online Continual Learning: A New Hopecited by 47
- 2016The Amazing Mysteries of the Gutter: Drawing Inferences Between Panels in Comic Book Narrativescited by 41
- 2022Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object Interactionscited by 34
- 2024Effective pruning of web-scale datasets based on complexity of concept clusterscited by 34
- 2023Loss-Curvature Matching for Dataset Selection and Condensationcited by 32
- 2025SEFE: Superficial and Essential Forgetting Eliminator for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuningcited by 32
- 2024Beyond Anti-Forgetting: Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning with Positive Forward Transfercited by 31
- 2022Unifying Approaches in Active Learning and Active Sampling via Fisher Information and Information-Theoretic Quantitiescited by 28
- 2023VISION Datasets: A Benchmark for Vision-based InduStrial InspectiONcited by 25
- 2018Training Neural Networks Using Features Replaycited by 23
- 2021On the Variance of the Fisher Information for Deep Learningcited by 22
- 2024Guided Profile Generation Improves Personalization with LLMscited by 19
- 2023Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real Worldcited by 18
- 2024Learning Equi-angular Representations for Online Continual Learningcited by 15
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Naturally Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Post-Trainingcited by 42
- 2025Continual Learning for Generative AI: From LLMs to MLLMs and Beyondcited by 9
- 2026SAME: Stabilized Mixture-of-Experts for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuningcited by 8
- 2026Spectral Imbalance Causes Forgetting in Low-Rank Continual Adaptationcited by 4
- 2026CL-VISTA: Benchmarking Continual Learning in Video Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026StrLoRA: Towards Streaming Continual Visual Instruction Tuning for MLLMscited by 0
- 2026CRAM: Centroid-Routing and Adaptive MoE for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuningcited by 0
- 2026ProtoAda: Prototype-Guided Adaptive Adapter Expansion and Geometric Consolidation for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuningcited by 0
- 2026ProtoAda: Prototype-Guided Adaptive Adapter Expansion and Geometric Consolidation for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning1 Jun 2026
- 2026CRAM: Centroid-Routing and Adaptive MoE for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning1 Jun 2026
- 2026StrLoRA: Towards Streaming Continual Visual Instruction Tuning for MLLMs8 May 2026
- 2026CL-VISTA: Benchmarking Continual Learning in Video Large Language Models1 Apr 2026
- 2026SAME: Stabilized Mixture-of-Experts for Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning2 Feb 2026
- 2026Spectral Imbalance Causes Forgetting in Low-Rank Continual Adaptation31 Jan 2026
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Naturally Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Post-Training7 Jul 2025
- 2025Continual Learning for Generative AI: From LLMs to MLLMs and Beyond16 Jun 2025