mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MCTSr-Zero: Self-Reflective Psychological Counseling Dialogues Generation via Principles and Adaptive Exploration

arXiv 2505.23229 ↗First posted 29 May 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated significant success in structured, problem-oriented tasks. However, applying these methods to open-ended dialogues, such as those in psychological counseling, presents unique challenges. Unlike tasks with objective correctness, success in therapeutic conversations depends on subjective factors like empathetic engagement, ethical adherence, and alignment with human preferences, for which strict "correctness" criteria are ill-defined. Existing result-oriented MCTS approaches can therefore produce misaligned responses. To address this, we introduce MCTSr-Zero, an MCTS framework designed for open-ended, human-centric dialogues. Its core innovation is "domain alignment", which shifts the MCTS search objective from predefined end-states towards conversational trajectories that conform to target domain principles (e.g., empathy in counseling). Furthermore, MCTSr-Zero incorporates "Regeneration" and "Meta-Prompt Adaptation" mechanisms to substantially broaden exploration by allowing the MCTS to consider fundamentally different initial dialogue strategies. We evaluate MCTSr-Zero in psychological counseling by generating multi-turn dialogue data, which is used to fine-tune an LLM, PsyLLM. We also introduce PsyEval, a benchmark for assessing multi-turn psychological counseling dialogues. Experiments demonstrate that PsyLLM achieves state-of-the-art performance on PsyEval and other relevant metrics, validating MCTSr-Zero's effectiveness in generating high-quality, principle-aligned conversational data for human-centric domains and addressing the LLM challenge of consistently adhering to complex psychological standards.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.

Builds on

13 of 23 references.

References · 13

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  2. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
  3. 2024Accessing GPT-4 level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8Bcited by 158
  4. 2024CPsyCoun: A Report-based Multi-turn Dialogue Reconstruction and Evaluation Framework for Chinese Psychological Counselingcited by 89
  5. 2024Beyond Examples: High-level Automated Reasoning Paradigm in In-Context Learning via MCTScited by 54
  6. 2024Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactionscited by 43
  7. 2024PsyDT: Using LLMs to Construct the Digital Twin of Psychological Counselor with Personalized Counseling Style for Psychological Counselingcited by 38
  8. 2025MCTS-Judge: Test-Time Scaling in LLM-as-a-Judge for Code Correctness Evaluationcited by 32
  9. 2023No Train Still Gain. Unleash Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models with Monte Carlo Tree Search Guided by Energy Functioncited by 20
  10. 2023Monte-Carlo Tree Search for Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Preliminary Resultscited by 9
  11. 2024PhyPlan: Compositional and Adaptive Physical Task Reasoning with Physics-Informed Skill Networks for Robot Manipulatorscited by 6
  12. 2023An Integrated Framework Integrating Monte Carlo Tree Search and Supervised Learning for Train Timetabling Problemcited by 5
1 more
  1. 2023General Method for Solving Four Types of SAT Problemscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.