Fusion Steering: Prompt-Specific Activation Control
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Activation steering methods
Abstract (arXiv)
We present Fusion Steering, an activation steering methodology that improves factual accuracy in large language models (LLMs) for question-answering (QA) tasks. This approach introduces flexible steering configurations, including full-layer steering and segmented steering. Unlike traditional methods constrained to single-layer or fixed-layer operations, Fusion Steering employs dynamic injection of prompt-specific activation deltas across all transformer layers. These activation deltas are derived from reference completions that combine the ground-truth answer with a model-generated explanation to facilitate semantically enriched, example-specific steering. The injection weights are optimized per prompt using Optuna, targeting a joint objective that balances token overlap (factual alignment) and perplexity (fluency proxy). Evaluation employs a composite score integrating token overlap and LLM-graded quality, encompassing factual accuracy, coherence, and relevance. Empirical results on 260 SimpleQA prompts (selected from 500 where the baseline failed) showcase the efficacy of segmented steering. Using Gemma-2-2B-IT with 8-bit quantization, segmented steering achieves an accuracy of 25.4% (outputs scoring ≥ 0.6), outperforming the baseline at 3.5% and full-layer steering at 16.2%. Under the stricter SimpleQA rubric, segmented steering boosts fully correct responses from 0.0% to 13.1%. These findings highlight the strengths of segmented, dynamic intervention strategies and the promise of per-prompt, full-network activation control. Fusion Steering is also amenable to sparse representations, such as Neuronpedia or sparse crosscoders, suggesting a promising direction for interpretable and scalable activation-level control in LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Activation steering methods, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.
Builds on
12 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Interpretable Steering of Large Language Models with Feature Guided Activation Additions17 Jan
- 2024Steering Large Language Models using Conceptors: Improving Addition-Based Activation Engineering9 Oct
- 2022Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Models10 May
Other references · 9
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 472
- 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 373
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 113
- 2024Style Vectors for Steering Generative Large Language Modelcited by 56
- 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structurecited by 52
- 2024Activation Scaling for Steering and Interpreting Language Modelscited by 35
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Steering When Necessary: Flexible Steering Large Language Models with Backtracking
- 2025Multi-Attribute Steering of Language Models via Targeted Intervention
- 2025Promptception: How Sensitive Are Large Multimodal Models to Prompts?
- 2026Beyond Steering Vector: Flow-based Activation Steering for Inference-Time Intervention
- 2025SteerConf: Steering LLMs for Confidence Elicitation
- 2026FineSteer: A Unified Framework for Fine-Grained Inference-Time Steering in Large Language Models
- 2023Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated Introspection
- 2025Beyond QA Pairs: Assessing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Fact Embedding in LLMs