Beyond QA Pairs: Assessing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Fact Embedding in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents an extensive examination of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) for embedding domain specific facts into Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on improving the fine-tuning process by categorizing question-answer (QA) pairs into Factual and Conceptual classes using a BERT-based classifier. Two distinct Llama-2 models are fine-tuned based on these classifications and evaluated using larger models like GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini. Our results indicate that models trained on conceptual datasets outperform those trained on factual datasets. Additionally, we compare the efficiency of two synthetic fine-tuning dataset generation techniques, D-RAG and D-Naive, with D-Naive demonstrating superior performance. Although PEFT has shown effectiveness, our research indicates that it may not be the most optimal method for embedding facts into LLMs. However, it has demonstrated exceptional performance in instruction-based tasks. Our findings are reinforced by a 1000-sample dataset in the data center domain, where the fine-tuned Llama-2 7B model significantly outperforms the baseline model in generating product recommendations. Our study highlights the importance of QA pair categorization and synthetic dataset generation techniques in enhancing the performance of LLMs in specific domains.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 12 references.
References · 12
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 446
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 274
- 2024RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAGcited by 262
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
- 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
- 2024RAG vs Fine-tuning: Pipelines, Tradeoffs, and a Case Study on Agriculturecited by 81
- 2024Rethinking Data Selection for Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 35
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024TAIA: Large Language Models are Out-of-Distribution Data Learners
- 2024Enhancing Q&A with Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning: A Comparative Study
- 2023Large Language Model Programs
- 2026Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Portuguese Question Answering: A Comparative Study of PEFT on BERTimbau and Exploratory Evaluation of Generative LLMs
- 2025Rethinking Data: Towards Better Performing Domain-Specific Small Language Models
- 2025GraphGen: Enhancing Supervised Fine-Tuning for LLMs with Knowledge-Driven Synthetic Data Generation
- 2026Fine-Tuning vs. RAG for Multi-Hop Question Answering with Novel Knowledge
- 2024Enhancing Large Language Model Performance To Answer Questions and Extract Information More Accurately