mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimal Transport-Based Token Weighting scheme for Enhanced Preference Optimization

arXiv 2505.18720 ↗First posted 24 May 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising framework for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences by directly optimizing the log-likelihood difference between chosen and rejected responses. However, existing methods assign equal importance to all tokens in the response, while humans focus on more meaningful parts. This leads to suboptimal preference optimization, as irrelevant or noisy tokens disproportionately influence DPO loss. To address this limitation, we propose Optimal Transport-based token weighting scheme for enhancing direct Preference Optimization (OTPO). By emphasizing semantically meaningful token pairs and de-emphasizing less relevant ones, our method introduces a context-aware token weighting scheme that yields a more contrastive reward difference estimate. This adaptive weighting enhances reward stability, improves interpretability, and ensures that preference optimization focuses on meaningful differences between responses. Extensive experiments have validated OTPO's effectiveness in improving instruction-following ability across various settingsfootnoteCode is available at https://github.com/Mimasss2/OTPO..

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 37 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

Builds on

37 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Anchored Preference Optimization and Contrastive Revisions: Addressing Underspecification in Alignment12 Aug
  2. 2024Eliminating Biased Length Reliance of Direct Preference Optimization via Down-Sampled KL Divergence16 Jun
  3. 2024Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transport9 Jun
  4. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  5. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  6. 2024Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment6 Apr
  7. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
  8. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
  9. 2024Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards8 Feb
  10. 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment1 Feb
  11. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  12. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
2 more
  1. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 23

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  9. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  10. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
  11. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  12. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
11 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  2. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
  3. 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
  4. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
  5. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  6. 2021ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Trainingcited by 341
  7. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 282
  8. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 232
  9. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 130
  10. 2023From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values -- A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Modelscited by 45
  11. 2023Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Token-Importance Guided Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2025Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay Perspective
  3. 2026TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio Matching
  4. 2024TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights
  5. 2026GAW-PO: Preference Optimization with Gradient-Aligned Token Weights
  6. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2026Masking Frequent Tokens Sharpens Direct Preference Optimization
  8. 2025Not All Preferences are What You Need for Post-Training: Selective Alignment Strategy for Preference Optimization