mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FaithfulSAE: Towards Capturing Faithful Features with Sparse Autoencoders without External Dataset Dependencies

arXiv 2506.17673 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising solution for decomposing large language model representations into interpretable features. However, Paulo and Belrose (2025) have highlighted instability across different initialization seeds, and Heap et al. (2025) have pointed out that SAEs may not capture model-internal features. These problems likely stem from training SAEs on external datasets - either collected from the Web or generated by another model - which may contain out-of-distribution (OOD) data beyond the model's generalisation capabilities. This can result in hallucinated SAE features, which we term "Fake Features", that misrepresent the model's internal activations. To address these issues, we propose FaithfulSAE, a method that trains SAEs on the model's own synthetic dataset. Using FaithfulSAEs, we demonstrate that training SAEs on less-OOD instruction datasets results in SAEs being more stable across seeds. Notably, FaithfulSAEs outperform SAEs trained on web-based datasets in the SAE probing task and exhibit a lower Fake Feature Ratio in 5 out of 7 models. Overall, our approach eliminates the dependency on external datasets, advancing interpretability by better capturing model-internal features while highlighting the often neglected importance of SAE training datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2025.

Builds on

21 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  6. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  7. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  8. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  9. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
  10. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
  11. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 339
  12. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
7 more
  1. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 88
  3. 2015Sparse Overcomplete Word Vector Representationscited by 44
  4. 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformerscited by 30
  5. 2024Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEscited by 23
  6. 2024Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layerscited by 22
  7. 2025Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Modelscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features
  2. 2026When Can We Trust the Sparse Lens? A Certification Framework for SAE Faithfulness
  3. 2026Discovering Millions of Interpretable Features with Sparse Autoencoders
  4. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
  5. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  6. 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languages
  7. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing
  8. 2026Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility