Information Capacity Regret Bounds for Bandits with Mediator Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work addresses the mediator feedback problem, a bandit game where the decision set consists of a number of policies, each associated with a probability distribution over a common space of outcomes. Upon choosing a policy, the learner observes an outcome sampled from its distribution and incurs the loss assigned to this outcome in the present round. We introduce the policy set capacity as an information-theoretic measure for the complexity of the policy set. Adopting the classical EXP4 algorithm, we provide new regret bounds depending on the policy set capacity in both the adversarial and the stochastic settings. For a selection of policy set families, we prove nearly-matching lower bounds, scaling similarly with the capacity. We also consider the case when the policies' distributions can vary between rounds, thus addressing the related bandits with expert advice problem, which we improve upon its prior results. Additionally, we prove a lower bound showing that exploiting the similarity between the policies is not possible in general under linear bandit feedback. Finally, for a full-information variant, we provide a regret bound scaling with the information radius of the policy set.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.
Builds on
21 of 48 references.
References · 21
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2014An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Samplingcited by 178
- 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
- 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
- 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
- 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 79
- 2019Contextual Bandits with Continuous Actions: Smoothing, Zooming, and Adaptingcited by 42
- 2018Satisficing in Time-Sensitive Bandit Learningcited by 38
- 2023A Blackbox Approach to Best of Both Worlds in Bandits and Beyondcited by 29
- 2022Nearly Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Online Learning with Feedback Graphscited by 26
- 2015First-order regret bounds for combinatorial semi-banditscited by 25
- 2020Efficient Contextual Bandits with Continuous Actionscited by 24
9 more
- 2021Deciding What to Learn: A Rate-Distortion Approachcited by 23
- 2018Make the Minority Great Again: First-Order Regret Bound for Contextual Banditscited by 17
- 2022Contextual Bandits with Smooth Regret: Efficient Learning in Continuous Action Spacescited by 17
- 2017Tight Bounds for Bandit Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 9
- 2018Contextual Bandits with Stochastic Expertscited by 5
- 2020Policy Optimization as Online Learning with Mediator Feedbackcited by 4
- 2023Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Bandits with Fixed Expert Advicecited by 2
- 2023Best Arm Identification in Bandits with Limited Precision Samplingcited by 2
- 2023Pure Exploration under Mediators' Feedbackcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Improved Regret Bounds for Bandits with Expert Advicecited by 3
- 2025Generator-Mediated Bandits: Thompson Sampling for GenAI-Powered Adaptive Interventionscited by 1
- 2025Instance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Nonstochastic Linear Partial Monitoringcited by 1
- 2026Pooling and Drift in Delayed Banditscited by 0
- 2026Pooling and Drift in Delayed Bandits1 Sep 2026
- 2025Instance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Nonstochastic Linear Partial Monitoring22 Oct 2025
- 2025Generator-Mediated Bandits: Thompson Sampling for GenAI-Powered Adaptive Interventions22 May 2025
- 2024Improved Regret Bounds for Bandits with Expert Advice24 Jun 2024