Caught in the Act: Probes Effectively Detect Sabotage and Catch Unverbalized Deception
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent incidents have highlighted the challenge of monitoring LLM agents and the danger of models deceiving people. We show that white-box deception detection via probes can be scaled up to frontier monitoring settings by collecting the largest deception dataset to date for training probes and introducing a novel probe architecture which can aggregate information across many layers and tokens. Our probes achieve 98.8% AUC in SHADE-Arena, surpassing an Opus 5.5 text-monitoring baseline, and show improved efficacy as the underlying model is scaled up. To push our probes to their limit, we test them on several cases where deception cannot be determined from the context alone. In these cases, which we refer to as introspective deception, the ground truth can only be determined through careful elicitation or thorough knowledge of a model's training data. In one such evaluation, we show that probes can distinguish transcripts containing a model's true hidden goal from other goals with an AUC of up to 99.7%. Our probes also readily detect deception on prominent open-weight models which lie about politically sensitive topics, and about their beliefs when put under pressure. We release our training dataset, dubbed FIBS, to help drive frontier deployment of effective probes, and encourage the community to expand upon it with further examples of deception and sabotage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
32 of 66 references.
References · 32
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 338
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 222
- 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 203
- 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 172
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 109
20 more
- 2026The Assistant Axis: Situating and Stabilizing the Default Persona of Language Modelscited by 76
- 2025SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agentscited by 58
- 2025The MASK Benchmark: Disentangling Honesty From Accuracy in AI Systemscited by 57
- 2025Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probescited by 45
- 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 41
- 2026Building Production-Ready Probes For Geminicited by 38
- 2026Constitutional Classifiers++: Efficient Production-Grade Defenses against Universal Jailbreakscited by 36
- 2026AuditBench: Evaluating Alignment Auditing Techniques on Models with Hidden Behaviorscited by 32
- 2025Benchmarking Deception Probes via Black-to-White Performance Boostscited by 17
- 2025Liars' Bench: Evaluating Lie Detectors for Language Modelscited by 17
- 2025Can We Predict Alignment Before Models Finish Thinking? Towards Monitoring Misaligned Reasoning Modelscited by 16
- 2026Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Modelscited by 12
- 2025Difficulties with Evaluating a Deception Detector for AIscited by 11
- 2026One Probe Won't Catch Them All: Towards Targeted Deception Detectioncited by 7
- 2026Censored LLMs as a Natural Testbed for Secret Knowledge Elicitationcited by 5
- 2026Training Deliberative Monitors for Black-Box Scheming Detectioncited by 3
- 2026Persona Cartography: Charting Language Model Personality Traits in Weight Spacecited by 3
- 2026"Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organismscited by 2
- 2026Emergent alignment and the projectability of ethical personascited by 1
- 2026Monitoring and Discovering Reward Hacking with Internal Representations during LLM Evaluationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.