Optimal Client Sampling in Federated Learning with Client-Level Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning with client-level differential privacy (DP) provides a promising framework for collaboratively training models while rigorously protecting clients' privacy. However, classic approaches like DP-FedAvg struggle when clients have heterogeneous privacy requirements, as they must uniformly enforce the strictest privacy level across all clients, leading to excessive DP noise and significant degradation in model utility. Existing methods to improve the model utility in such heterogeneous privacy settings often assume a trusted server and are largely heuristic, resulting in suboptimal performance and lacking strong theoretical foundations. In this work, we address these challenges under a practical attack model where both clients and the server are honest-but-curious. We propose GDPFed, which partitions clients into groups based on their privacy budgets and achieves client-level DP within each group to reduce the privacy budget waste and hence improve the model utility. Based on the privacy and convergence analysis of GDPFed, we find that the magnitude of DP noise depends on both model dimensionality and the per-group client sampling ratios. To further improve the performance of GDPFed, we introduce GDPFed^+, which integrates model sparsification to eliminate unnecessary noise and optimizes per-group client sampling ratios to minimize convergence error. Extensive empirical evaluations on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of GDPFed^+, showing substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
47 of 73 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2018Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Accelerationcited by 367
35 more
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 220
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 204
- 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
- 2022Fine-tuning Global Model via Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 172
- 2018cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGDcited by 158
- 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 128
- 2020Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learningcited by 124
- 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
- 2020Bypassing the Ambient Dimension: Private SGD with Gradient Subspace Identificationcited by 90
- 2021Do Not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private Learningcited by 86
- 2019Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep Learningcited by 71
- 2023Fixing by Mixing: A Recipe for Optimal Byzantine ML under Heterogeneitycited by 65
- 2020FastSecAgg: Scalable Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 61
- 2019Understanding Top-k Sparsification in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 56
- 2020Collaborative Learning in the Jungle (Decentralized, Byzantine, Heterogeneous, Asynchronous and Nonconvex Learning)cited by 54
- 2020Communication-Efficient Federated Learning via Optimal Client Samplingcited by 39
- 2022Differentially Private Federated Learning with Local Regularization and Sparsificationcited by 36
- 2022On Privacy and Personalization in Cross-Silo Federated Learningcited by 36
- 2022Federated Learning with Sparsified Model Perturbation: Improving Accuracy under Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 33
- 2023Make Landscape Flatter in Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 33
- 2015Heterogeneous Differential Privacycited by 30
- 2020Federated Learning in the Sky: Aerial-Ground Air Quality Sensing Framework with UAV Swarmscited by 26
- 2020Federated Learning with Sparsification-Amplified Privacy and Adaptive Optimizationcited by 26
- 2022DELTA: Diverse Client Sampling for Fasting Federated Learningcited by 24
- 2019Federated Learning with Autotuned Communication-Efficient Secure Aggregationcited by 23
- 2023Have it your way: Individualized Privacy Assignment for DP-SGDcited by 21
- 2024Achieving Byzantine-Resilient Federated Learning via Layer-Adaptive Sparsified Model Aggregationcited by 15
- 2021Federated Intrusion Detection for IoT with Heterogeneous Cohort Privacycited by 14
- 2025Detecting Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning via Direction Alignment Inspectioncited by 13
- 2024Cross-silo Federated Learning with Record-level Personalized Differential Privacycited by 9
- 2024Noise-Aware Algorithm for Heterogeneous Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2023Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning with Variance Reduction and Differential Privacycited by 8
- 2025Differentially Private Federated Learning With Time-Adaptive Privacy Spendingcited by 5
- 2024The Power of Bias: Optimizing Client Selection in Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Differential Privacycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.