The Power of Bias: Optimizing Client Selection in Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To preserve the data privacy, the federated learning (FL) paradigm emerges in which clients only expose model gradients rather than original data for conducting model training. To enhance the protection of model gradients in FL, differentially private federated learning (DPFL) is proposed which incorporates differentially private (DP) noises to obfuscate gradients before they are exposed. Yet, an essential but largely overlooked problem in DPFL is the heterogeneity of clients' privacy requirement, which can vary significantly between clients and extremely complicates the client selection problem in DPFL. In other words, both the data quality and the influence of DP noises should be taken into account when selecting clients. To address this problem, we conduct convergence analysis of DPFL under heterogeneous privacy, a generic client selection strategy, popular DP mechanisms and convex loss. Based on convergence analysis, we formulate the client selection problem to minimize the value of loss function in DPFL with heterogeneous privacy, which is a convex optimization problem and can be solved efficiently. Accordingly, we propose the DPFL-BCS (biased client selection) algorithm. The extensive experiment results with real datasets under both convex and non-convex loss functions indicate that DPFL-BCS can remarkably improve model utility compared with the SOTA baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 625
- 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
- 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
- 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectorycited by 93
- 2020Federated Accelerated Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 85
- 2018Privacy Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutionscited by 78
- 2021Differentially Private Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 74
9 more
- 2021Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistencycited by 66
- 2022TCT: Convexifying Federated Learning using Bootstrapped Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 26
- 2019The Value of Collaboration in Convex Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 24
- 2022DELTA: Diverse Client Sampling for Fasting Federated Learningcited by 24
- 2021Efficient Differentially Private Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning via Hardness of Learning with Errorscited by 23
- 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Generalization: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
- 2020Compression Boosts Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 13
- 2021Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2024A Joint Approach to Local Updating and Gradient Compression for Efficient Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.