mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TimeSeriesGym: A Scalable Benchmark for (Time Series) Machine Learning Engineering Agents

arXiv 2505.13291 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce TimeSeriesGym, a scalable benchmarking framework for evaluating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents on time series machine learning engineering challenges. Existing benchmarks lack scalability, focus narrowly on model building in well-defined settings, and evaluate only a limited set of research artifacts (e.g., CSV submission files). To make AI agent benchmarking more relevant to the practice of machine learning engineering, our framework scales along two critical dimensions. First, recognizing that effective ML engineering requires a range of diverse skills, TimeSeriesGym incorporates challenges from diverse sources spanning multiple domains and tasks. We design challenges to evaluate both isolated capabilities (including data handling, understanding research repositories, and code translation) and their combinations, and rather than addressing each challenge independently, we develop tools that support designing multiple challenges at scale. Second, we implement evaluation mechanisms for multiple research artifacts, including submission files, code, and models, using both precise numeric measures and more flexible LLM-based evaluation approaches. This dual strategy balances objective assessment with contextual judgment. Although our initial focus is on time series applications, our framework can be readily extended to other data modalities, broadly enhancing the comprehensiveness and practical utility of agentic AI evaluation. We open-source our benchmarking framework to facilitate future research on the ML engineering capabilities of AI agents.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  2. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  3. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
  4. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
  5. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 482
  6. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  7. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
  8. 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 226
  9. 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 175
  10. 2024DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?cited by 125
  11. 2023ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Codecited by 65
  12. 2024SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositoriescited by 52
4 more
  1. 2024TimeSeriesExam: A time series understanding examcited by 49
  2. 2024Automated Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Task-Specific Exam Generationcited by 25
  3. 2025ML-Dev-Bench: Comparative Analysis of AI Agents on ML development workflowscited by 17
  4. 2023AQuA: A Benchmarking Tool for Label Quality Assessmentcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 11.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026TimeSage-MT: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Time Series Reasoning
  2. 2025Bench to the Future: A Pastcasting Benchmark for Forecasting Agents
  3. 2025TimeSeriesScientist: A General-Purpose AI Agent for Time Series Analysis
  4. 2025When LLM Meets Time Series: Can LLMs Perform Multi-Step Time Series Reasoning and Inference
  5. 2026MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI
  6. 2025FML-bench: Benchmarking Machine Learning Agents for Scientific Research
  7. 2025MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research
  8. 2025MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents