MILO: Automated Harness Discovery via Orchestrated Multi-Agent Evolution
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks also fits: Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern agentic systems combine an AI model with a harness that controls execution and environmental interactions. Harness design strongly affects long-horizon performance, yet its combinatorial search space demands substantial human effort that must be repeated as models change. Existing automated methods explore this space narrowly, optimizing only components such as prompts or skills or becoming trapped by fixed, exploitative search strategies. We introduce MILO (Meta-evolutionary Island Orchestration), a framework that co-evolves agent harnesses and the strategy used to discover them. MILO combines: (i) hierarchical lineage memory over island-based trees, using rejected mutations as negative evidence; (ii) per-island mutator agents that rewrite complete harnesses using global search history and parent-specific feedback; and (iii) an orchestrator that adapts search through lineage grafting and speciation, mutator reassignment and curriculum revision. Across Terminal-Bench 2.1, PaperBench, and DeepSWE, MILO-discovered harnesses outperform eight state-of-the-art harnesses and six search methods using frontier (Opus 4.8) and open-weight (gpt-oss-120b) models. With Opus 4.8, MILO improves resolution over its initial harness by +12.0%, +28.3%, and +10.3%, respectively, compared with best prior-search gains of +4.5%, +18.3%, and 0%. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it achieves 86.1 ± 2.0%, exceeding the official leaderboard's top entry (83.8 ± 2.3%) while using 26% fewer tokens than its initial harness. On EinsteinArena open problems, MILO improves best-known upper bounds for ErdHos minimum-overlap (0.3808586 → 0.3808568) and the first and third autocorrelation inequalities (1.50274365 → 1.50274360; 1.45081 → 1.44889).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Rethinking the Evaluation of Harness Evolution for Agents
- 2026DarwinX: Evolving Agent Harnesses Through Natural Selection
- 2026HarnessCompass: Guiding Automatic Harness Evolution toward Generalizable and Effective Agent Harnesses
- 2026HarnessBank: Semantic Gene-Bank Search with Gated Verification for Agent-Harness Self-Evolution
- 2026Raven: The Harness of Harnesses for Composable Agentic Intelligence
- 2026CORAL: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Evolution for Open-Ended Discovery
- 2026HarnessForge: Joint Harness and Policy Evolution for Adaptive Agent Systems
- 2026Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails