mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantifying and Explaining Machine Learning Uncertainty in Predictive Process Monitoring: An Operations Research Perspective

arXiv 2304.06412 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a comprehensive, multi-stage machine learning methodology that effectively integrates information systems and artificial intelligence to enhance decision-making processes within the domain of operations research. The proposed framework adeptly addresses common limitations of existing solutions, such as the neglect of data-driven estimation for vital production parameters, exclusive generation of point forecasts without considering model uncertainty, and lacking explanations regarding the sources of such uncertainty. Our approach employs Quantile Regression Forests for generating interval predictions, alongside both local and global variants of SHapley Additive Explanations for the examined predictive process monitoring problem. The practical applicability of the proposed methodology is substantiated through a real-world production planning case study, emphasizing the potential of prescriptive analytics in refining decision-making procedures. This paper accentuates the imperative of addressing these challenges to fully harness the extensive and rich data resources accessible for well-informed decision-making.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2023.

Builds on

26 of 75 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  5. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  6. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 623
  7. 2014From Predictive to Prescriptive Analyticscited by 143
  8. 2020Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertaintycited by 129
  9. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  10. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  11. 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
  12. 2020Getting a CLUE: A Method for Explaining Uncertainty Estimatescited by 92
14 more
  1. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 60
  2. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  3. 2013Predictive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 37
  4. 2017Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 37
  5. 2021Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plotscited by 35
  6. 2021A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process predictioncited by 32
  7. 2018Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?cited by 27
  8. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Process Mining: A General Overview and Application of a Novel Local Explanation Approach for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 20
  9. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A reality rooted perspectivecited by 12
  10. 2022When to intervene? Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Uncertainty and Resource Constraintscited by 11
  11. 2017Temporal Stability in Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 8
  12. 2020Local Post-Hoc Explanations for Predictive Process Monitoring in Manufacturingcited by 7
  13. 2021An Interpretable Probabilistic Model for Short-Term Solar Power Forecasting Using Natural Gradient Boostingcited by 6
  14. 2022Learning Uncertainty with Artificial Neural Networks for Improved Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

10 papers.