mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decompose-and-Refine: Structured Legal Question Answering with Parametric Retrieval

arXiv 2605.24454 ↗First posted 23 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in the legal domain, demonstrating notable potential in Legal Question Answering (LQA). However, unlike general QA, LQA requires answers that are not only accurate but also rigorously grounded in explicit legal authority. In statutory LQA, many questions require multi-hop reasoning across multiple legal issues, substantially increasing the risk of hallucination, thereby making accurate retrieval of supporting statutory provisions a critical prerequisite. Despite recent progress in multi-hop QA, existing approaches often rely on reasoning in natural language or retrieval without explicit query reformulation, leaving the vocabulary gap between user questions and statutory text largely unaddressed. To address this challenge, we propose Decompose-and-Refine (DaR), a statute-grounded LQA framework that tightly integrates step-wise question decomposition with parametric knowledge-based query refinement. DaR progressively decomposes a complex legal question into atomic sub-questions and generates statute-aligned parametric queries for each sub-question, enabling the selection of a single most central statutory provision corresponding to each legal issue. We evaluate DaR on KoBLEX, a Korean multi-hop LQA benchmark grounded in statutory law, using Qwen3-32B and Gemma3-27B. Experimental results demonstrate that DaR consistently improves both retrieval accuracy and final answer quality over existing approaches. Moreover, by explicitly separating sub-questions and their corresponding statutory provisions, DaR facilitates transparent, issue-level verification of complex legal reasoning processes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 33 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  5. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  6. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  7. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
  8. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
  9. 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 176
  10. 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
  11. 2025LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Examscited by 54
  12. 2025A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmarkcited by 37
5 more
  1. 2025DualRAG: A Dual-Process Approach to Integrate Reasoning and Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 20
  2. 2023Probabilistic Tree-of-thought Reasoning for Answering Knowledge-intensive Complex Questionscited by 19
  3. 2025L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Auditcited by 11
  4. 2025KoBLEX: Open Legal Question Answering with Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 7
  5. 2025GuRE:Generative Query REwriter for Legal Passage Retrievalcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Interpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
  2. 2025Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal Reasoning
  3. 2025NitiBench: A Comprehensive Study of LLM Framework Capabilities for Thai Legal Question Answering
  4. 2026From Query to Counsel: Structured Reasoning with a Multi-Agent Framework and Dataset for Legal Consultation
  5. 2025Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agent for Trustworthy Legal Question Answering in Judicial Forensics
  6. 2026Efficient LLM Distillation for Bangladesh Legal Context: A Smartphone-Compatible Retrieval-Augmented Generation Model
  7. 2024GRAF: Graph Retrieval Augmented by Facts for Romanian Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering
  8. 2024Experimenting with Legal AI Solutions: The Case of Question-Answering for Access to Justice