mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Destructive Language Model

arXiv 2505.12186 ↗First posted 18 May 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 10

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

Harmful fine-tuning attacks pose a major threat to the security of large language models (LLMs), allowing adversaries to compromise safety guardrails with minimal harmful data. While existing defenses attempt to reinforce LLM alignment, they fail to address models' inherent "trainability" on harmful data, leaving them vulnerable to stronger attacks with increased learning rates or larger harmful datasets. To overcome this critical limitation, we introduce SEAM, a novel alignment-enhancing defense that transforms LLMs into self-destructive models with intrinsic resilience to misalignment attempts. Specifically, these models retain their capabilities for legitimate tasks while exhibiting substantial performance degradation when fine-tuned on harmful data. The protection is achieved through a novel loss function that couples the optimization trajectories of benign and harmful data, enhanced with adversarial gradient ascent to amplify the self-destructive effect. To enable practical training, we develop an efficient Hessian-free gradient estimate with theoretical error bounds. Extensive evaluation across LLMs and datasets demonstrates that SEAM creates a no-win situation for adversaries: the self-destructive models achieve state-of-the-art robustness against low-intensity attacks and undergo catastrophic performance collapse under high-intensity attacks, rendering them effectively unusable. The code is available: https://github.com/ZJUWYH/seam. (Warning: this paper contains potentially harmful content generated by LLMs.)

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 64 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

Builds on

64 of 96 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025NeuRel-Attack: Neuron Relearning for Safety Disalignment in Large Language Models29 Apr
  2. 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs24 Feb
  3. 2024Targeted Vaccine: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-Tuning via Layer-wise Perturbation13 Oct
  4. 2024Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey26 Sep
  5. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction17 Jun
  6. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
  7. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Models31 May
  8. 2024Lisa: Lazy Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attack28 May
  9. 2024Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuning23 May
  10. 2024A safety realignment framework via subspace-oriented model fusion for large language models15 May
  11. 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safety1 Apr
  12. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning5 Mar
2 more
  1. 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications7 Feb
  2. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct

Other references · 50

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  10. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  11. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  12. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
38 more
  1. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
  2. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 505
  3. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
  4. 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 498
  5. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 387
  6. 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
  7. 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 302
  8. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 297
  9. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 257
  10. 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 175
  11. 2024Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language Modelscited by 167
  12. 2024Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 138
  13. 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safetycited by 123
  14. 2022Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 122
  15. 2024Vaccine: Perturbation-aware Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attackcited by 115
  16. 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Modelscited by 104
  17. 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correctcited by 98
  18. 2023Fine-tuning can cripple your foundation model; preserving features may be the solutioncited by 96
  19. 2024Keeping LLMs Aligned After Fine-tuning: The Crucial Role of Prompt Templatescited by 96
  20. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 92
  21. 2024Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbationcited by 92
  22. 2024Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptationcited by 80
  23. 2024Gradient Cuff: Detecting Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models by Exploring Refusal Loss Landscapescited by 74
  24. 2025Rethinking LLM Unlearning Objectives: A Gradient Perspective and Go Beyondcited by 61
  25. 2022Self-Destructing Models: Increasing the Costs of Harmful Dual Uses of Foundation Modelscited by 57
  26. 2024On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 52
  27. 2024Eraser: Jailbreaking Defense in Large Language Models via Unlearning Harmful Knowledgecited by 51
  28. 2023Fake Alignment: Are LLMs Really Aligned Well?cited by 39
  29. 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 34
  30. 2024Human Motion Instruction Tuningcited by 29
  31. 2023CPSeg: Finer-grained Image Semantic Segmentation via Chain-of-Thought Language Promptingcited by 28
  32. 2025GraphRAG under Firecited by 24
  33. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks by Solving Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 21
  34. 2024RobustKV: Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via KV Evictioncited by 21
  35. 2023Making Harmful Behaviors Unlearnable for Large Language Modelscited by 20
  36. 2018Identifying Generalization Properties in Neural Networkscited by 15
  37. 2023Watch Your Language: Investigating Content Moderation with Large Language Modelscited by 14
  38. 2024Toward Secure Tuning: Mitigating Security Risks from Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Curvature-Aware Safety Restoration In LLMs Fine-Tuning
  2. 2025Secure LLM Fine-Tuning via Safety-Aware Probing
  3. 2024Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning
  4. 2026Target-free Latent Safety Alignment
  5. 2025AdversariaLLM: A Unified and Modular Toolbox for LLM Robustness Research
  6. 2026Understanding and Preserving Safety in Fine-Tuned LLMs
  7. 2024Locking Down the Finetuned LLMs Safety
  8. 2025SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuning