Curvature-Aware Safety Restoration In LLMs Fine-Tuning
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream tasks often compromises safety alignment, even when using parameter-efficient methods like LoRA. In this work, we uncover a notable property: fine-tuned models preserve the geometric structure of their loss landscapes concerning harmful content, regardless of the fine-tuning method employed. This suggests that safety behaviors are not erased but shifted to less influential regions of the parameter space. Building on this insight, we propose a curvature-aware alignment restoration method that leverages influence functions and second-order optimization to selectively increase loss on harmful inputs while preserving task performance. By navigating the shared geometry between base and fine-tuned models, our method discourages unsafe outputs while preserving task-relevant performance, avoiding full reversion and enabling precise, low-impact updates. Extensive evaluations across multiple model families and adversarial settings show that our approach efficiently reduces harmful responses while maintaining or even improving utility and few-shot learning performance.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2025.
Builds on
31 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Safety Layers in Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Security30 Aug
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
- 2024Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models27 May
- 2024Vaccine: Perturbation-aware Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attack2 Feb
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback19 Oct
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
Other references · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 525
12 more
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 507
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 491
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 288
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 247
- 2024Safe LoRA: the Silver Lining of Reducing Safety Risks when Fine-tuning Large Language Modelscited by 122
- 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Promptscited by 112
- 2024A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 54
- 2025Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safetycited by 49
- 2025SaLoRA: Safety-Alignment Preserved Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 39
- 2024On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Continual Safety Alignment via Gradient-Based Sample Selectioncited by 4
- 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sinkcited by 3
- 2026Guardrails in Logit Space: Safety Token Regularization for LLM Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026The Heterogeneous Safety Impacts of Benign Multilingual Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Why Jailbreaks Succeed in Diffusion Language Models: An Energy Landscape Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Why Jailbreaks Succeed in Diffusion Language Models: An Energy Landscape Analysis25 Sep 2026
- 2026The Heterogeneous Safety Impacts of Benign Multilingual Fine-Tuning27 Jun 2026
- 2026Continual Safety Alignment via Gradient-Based Sample Selection19 Apr 2026
- 2026Guardrails in Logit Space: Safety Token Regularization for LLM Alignment19 Apr 2026
- 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sink5 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Safety at One Shot: Patching Fine-Tuned LLMs with A Single Instance
- 2026The Geometry of Alignment Collapse: When Fine-Tuning Breaks Safety
- 2025Gradient Surgery for Safe LLM Fine-Tuning
- 2025Secure LLM Fine-Tuning via Safety-Aware Probing
- 2026Understanding and Preserving Safety in Fine-Tuned LLMs
- 2026Safeguarding LLM Fine-tuning via Push-Pull Distributional Alignment
- 2025SafeMERGE: Preserving Safety Alignment in Fine-Tuned Large Language Models via Selective Layer-Wise Model Merging
- 2026Safety Anchor: Defending Harmful Fine-tuning via Geometric Bottlenecks