mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Signal in the Noise: Polysemantic Interference Transfers and Predicts Cross-Model Influence

arXiv 2505.11611 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.CRcited by 4

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Polysemanticity is pervasive in language models and remains a major challenge for interpretation and model behavioral control. Leveraging sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we map the polysemantic topology of two small models (Pythia-70M and GPT-2-Small) to identify SAE feature pairs that are semantically unrelated yet exhibit interference within models. We intervene at four foci (prompt, token, feature, neuron) and measure induced shifts in the next-token prediction distribution, uncovering polysemantic structures that expose a systematic vulnerability in these models. Critically, interventions distilled from counterintuitive interference patterns shared by two small models transfer reliably to larger instruction-tuned models (Llama-3.1-8B/70B-Instruct and Gemma-2-9B-Instruct), yielding predictable behavioral shifts without access to model internals. These findings challenge the view that polysemanticity is purely stochastic, demonstrating instead that interference structures generalize across scale and family. Such generalization suggests a convergent, higher-order organization of internal representations, which is only weakly aligned with intuition and structured by latent regularities, offering new possibilities for both black-box control and theoretical insight into human and artificial cognition.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

30 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SAEs Can Improve Unlearning: Dynamic Sparse Autoencoder Guardrails for Precision Unlearning in LLMs11 Apr
  2. 2025Don't Forget It! Conditional Sparse Autoencoder Clamping Works for Unlearning14 Mar
  3. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models7 Mar
  4. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features28 Jan
  5. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models25 Oct
  6. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders22 Sep
  7. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
  8. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  9. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 21

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  3. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  4. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  5. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  6. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
  7. 2022Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Processcited by 153
  8. 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 85
  9. 2023Composite Backdoor Attacks Against Large Language Modelscited by 73
  10. 2025Shared Global and Local Geometry of Language Model Embeddingscited by 36
  11. 2023Don't trust your eyes: on the (un)reliability of feature visualizationscited by 32
  12. 2024PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuitscited by 29
9 more
  1. 2023Scaling Laws for Adversarial Attacks on Language Model Activationscited by 19
  2. 2023What Causes Polysemanticity? An Alternative Origin Story of Mixed Selectivity from Incidental Causescited by 19
  3. 2024Linear Explanations for Individual Neuronscited by 19
  4. 2024Understanding polysemanticity in neural networks through coding theorycited by 17
  5. 2025Layers at Similar Depths Generate Similar Activations Across LLM Architecturescited by 12
  6. 2023Learning from Emergence: A Study on Proactively Inhibiting the Monosemantic Neurons of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 5
  7. 2024Tackling Polysemanticity with Neuron Embeddingscited by 2
  8. 2025SAFR: Neuron Redistribution for Interpretabilitycited by 2
  9. 2025OASIS: Order-Augmented Strategy for Improved Code Searchcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
  2. 2025Disentangling Polysemantic Neurons with a Null-Calibrated Polysemanticity Index and Causal Patch Interventions
  3. 2024Encourage or Inhibit Monosemanticity? Revisit Monosemanticity from a Feature Decorrelation Perspective
  4. 2025Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous Words
  5. 2026Descriptive Collision in Sparse Autoencoder Auto-Interpretability: When One Explanation Describes Many Features
  6. 2026The Rate-Distortion-Polysemanticity Tradeoff in SAEs
  7. 2026Polysemanticity or Polysemy? Lexical Identity Confounds Superposition Metrics
  8. 2026Finding the Translation Switch: Discovering and Exploiting the Task-Initiation Features in LLMs