Disentangling Polysemantic Neurons with a Null-Calibrated Polysemanticity Index and Causal Patch Interventions
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks often contain polysemantic neurons that respond to multiple, sometimes unrelated, features, complicating mechanistic interpretability. We introduce the Polysemanticity Index (PSI), a null-calibrated metric that quantifies when a neuron's top activations decompose into semantically distinct clusters. PSI multiplies three independently calibrated components: geometric cluster quality (S), alignment to labeled categories (Q), and open-vocabulary semantic distinctness via CLIP (D). On a pretrained ResNet-50 evaluated with Tiny-ImageNet images, PSI identifies neurons whose activation sets split into coherent, nameable prototypes, and reveals strong depth trends: later layers exhibit substantially higher PSI than earlier layers. We validate our approach with robustness checks (varying hyperparameters, random seeds, and cross-encoder text heads), breadth analyses (comparing class-only vs. open-vocabulary concepts), and causal patch-swap interventions. In particular, aligned patch replacements increase target-neuron activation significantly more than non-aligned, random, shuffled-position, or ablate-elsewhere controls. PSI thus offers a principled and practical lever for discovering, quantifying, and studying polysemantic units in neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2025.
Builds on
7 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Signal in the Noise: Polysemantic Interference Transfers and Predicts Cross-Model Influence
- 2022Interpreting Neural Networks through the Polytope Lens
- 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models
- 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectors
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameters
- 2026MonoLoss: A Training Objective for Interpretable Monosemantic Representations
- 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsity