mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Disentangling Polysemantic Neurons with a Null-Calibrated Polysemanticity Index and Causal Patch Interventions

arXiv 2508.16950 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks often contain polysemantic neurons that respond to multiple, sometimes unrelated, features, complicating mechanistic interpretability. We introduce the Polysemanticity Index (PSI), a null-calibrated metric that quantifies when a neuron's top activations decompose into semantically distinct clusters. PSI multiplies three independently calibrated components: geometric cluster quality (S), alignment to labeled categories (Q), and open-vocabulary semantic distinctness via CLIP (D). On a pretrained ResNet-50 evaluated with Tiny-ImageNet images, PSI identifies neurons whose activation sets split into coherent, nameable prototypes, and reveals strong depth trends: later layers exhibit substantially higher PSI than earlier layers. We validate our approach with robustness checks (varying hyperparameters, random seeds, and cross-encoder text heads), breadth analyses (comparing class-only vs. open-vocabulary concepts), and causal patch-swap interventions. In particular, aligned patch replacements increase target-neuron activation significantly more than non-aligned, random, shuffled-position, or ablate-elsewhere controls. PSI thus offers a principled and practical lever for discovering, quantifying, and studying polysemantic units in neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2025.

Builds on

7 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuits9 Apr

Other references · 6

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  4. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  5. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  6. 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Signal in the Noise: Polysemantic Interference Transfers and Predicts Cross-Model Influence
  2. 2022Interpreting Neural Networks through the Polytope Lens
  3. 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models
  5. 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectors
  6. 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameters
  7. 2026MonoLoss: A Training Objective for Interpretable Monosemantic Representations
  8. 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsity